In the profession of documentation & archives, those who work in this field know that a photo or a video contains more information than what they initially are showing. So, how do you document? 

• Example:

  A photo or video shows a destroyed residential building where a little girl has been pulled out from the rubble The documentation goes like this:

  We would add the photo or video to 'erasure of habitality' in 'crimes of extermination' as 'erasure of habitability' as a method of extermination.. Then, we would add the photo or video to 'residential buildings' under 'domicide' because the Israelis don't the people return to their homes, so they destroy people's homes.

  But, there was a little girl pulled out from the rubble. The documentation would then be like this:

  We would add the photo or video also to 'war crimes' as killing of children is killing of civilians, which is a war crime. But, she was in the building at the time of the Israeli attack.

  The next step would be answering the question 'Are there similar photos or videos archived?'. If the answer is 'yes' then we're dealing with 'killings > methods' > 'killing people in buildings'.

  It can be more complex when there are too many content found about children killed by Israelis no matter where in Gaza. The photo or video would then also be archived under 'genocide > children and/or women' (= gender genocide)

  So, a same photo or video can be found on many places of our website.