Everything that happens in the world has a beginning and mostly an end. Everything in between moments in an array.

There are different names for this whole and the same structure like order, sequence, or timeline. The entire structure is called chronology. A movie is just like that but only if you leave it the way it is: uncut.

Unfortunately, this is often not the case, in particular when it comes to issues that are the motive to launch this website.

That what is between the Palestinians and the descendants of East European Jewish migrants, no matter in what form or in what present or future time, was once about the desire for lebensraum expressed in 1898; escalated in 1947 into a war against the British colonizers during a massive civilian invasion from Eastern Europe. 

Why "civilian invasion"? 

The British, who at that time had British Mandatory Palestine, laid out a blockage off the coast as their mandate to stop the migration. But ships with East European Jewish migrants kept arriving and started to breach the blockage. It is here that it became a civilian invasion.

Claims and counter-claims; narratives and rhetoric and other used ways of thinking, only to seek authority even by force,  have prompted us to display a view that isn't about supporting any side but to bring some cleanness in the huge mess the information war both sides and their supporters are still producing. We begin there where they don't, namely the beginning as the outcome of the beginning tells who's right.

The birth of any nation (if it is historically correct a nation) doesn't begin with who were the first inhabitants.

Defining the birth of any nation starts with the question of where they (those who are claimed as being "the first") come from. If you can't answer or even if you refuse to answer the question the way you are supposed to answer, no matter for whatever reason, you cannot claim. 

Because, migrants were also those who had to evaluate into modern humans, and were the very first who settled while human-made partitions of the world didn't exist, let alone that they knew to partition the way it happens in the West Bank, and to name partition, for example in "Area C*".

Partition is also the way how countries came to exist.

Prehistoric migration was no different from all migrations centuries later as they all mean the same: rebuilding a continuation of existence elsewhere. The Jews did just that when they fled from the Roman invaders to Spain and from there to Central Europe where they rebuilt the continuation of their existence. It is called post-historical continuity. 

This elementary principle is widely not known mostly among those who never have heard about historical continuity in particular the Israelis and those who support them. This group of people does not speak but uses "antisemitism" as a weapon to silence those they view as their enemy while it is the Israelis who do not have historical continuity at all.

*) "Area C" is an illegally annexed area in the West Bank designated for new settlements.

The belief of the Jews is called Judaism and has been described in many ways. The Australian version reads like this:

"Judaism is the religion and the way of life of the Jewish people. It is the oldest of the monotheistic faiths in the Abrahamic tradition which includes Christianity and Islam."

The Australian version doesn't read where Judaism comes from, and it also contains incorrectness.

There are a lot of Jewish religious quotations found concerning the question of where Judaism comes from.

An example is this one from what is called Shema:

"Listen, Israel, Hashem is our Elohim, Hashem is one’.

But in Deuteronomy 6:4 from the Torah, we found

"Hear Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one."

These quotations are remarkable because you can read "Listen Israel" and "Hear Israel". Both are namely a call to people who live somewhere that carries "Israel". 

But, there's no map from that time to which the quotes belong, and that shows "Israel".

The map that is the closest to this issue is the pictured map on the left. Because "is one" means in the Jewish language "echad".

But, if you prefixed by only writing "is", you risk that the quotes can be read as that (..whatever...) wasn't "one" but "more".  Because the quotes carry the character that there has been concluded "...is ours" and "... is one", and suggest it is concluded by choice between ...?...

That brings us to the question:  If it was "more", which was "more" that merged into "one", and who were they who merged "more" into "one"?

In other words, the deliberation about the roots of Judaism hints to its identity as an off-shoot from tribal beliefs. Most clearest example that reveals Judaism as a (possible) off-shoot of tribal beliefs is the way Israeli orthodox Jews are during religious festivities.

However, using the term "Abrahamic" is misleading as it suggests that Abraham was a Jew. He was a member of the Hebrew tribe from Ur in Southern Mesopotamia, now today's Southern Iraq.

"Hebrew" has been made a derivative for a tribal belief no one is (still) able to specify what this belief was Abraham and his people were practicing. It is originally the name of the people Abraham belonged to.

The "Hebrew tribal belief" merged with a belief that was in Cana'an when Abraham and his people settled. That explains why you still can see tribal characteristics in Judaism. However, the Israelis still claim that the Cana'an tribal belief is Jewish.

There's more mix-up:

The Israelis misleadingly use the name of the Israelites.

"Israelis" is a derivative naming East European Jewish migrants given themselves in 1948. It became internationally recognized only after the Jewish terrorist group Lehi assassinated the Swedish UN diplomat Folke Bernadotte outside Jerusalem.

"Israelites" is an adjective given to people of a nomadic tribe who were not Jewish but had a tribal multi-god belief.  They came from what is called "the south", and entered the territory of the Amelekite tribe who lived in what is now the Negev Desert. The Amalekites drove the Israelites out of their territory into the northern direction. But, it is King David who drove the Israelites into Cana'an.

The explanation about the Israelites is a summary based on paragraphs we found on topics concerning Judaism.

Another incorrectness is describing Christianity and Islam as included in the Abrahamic tradition. However, the order is that Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism while Islam is an offshoot of Christianity. Catholicism is also an offshoot of Christianity.

The Australian version also mentions "... and the way of life ...".

The life the Australians are referring to is only seen among (extreme) conservatists among the Israelis.

Jewish conservatists who live around the world are not like their Israeli counterparts who are known for their aggressive behavior towards women when their way of dressing is not in line with extreme conservatist views.

These types of Israelis are also known for their hate against people from religions other than those they have.

You can witness their hate at least during the overlaps of their "Passover" with the Ramadan of the Palestinians at the Al Aqsa compound.

GLOSM has observed developments on this issue since December 2008, which was one of the two months of war the Israelis were waging in Gaza.  On January 3, 2009, the then-president of the United States, George W Bush falsely blamed Hamas for this war.

If you Google for the answer to the question, of what has led to the 2008-2009 Gaza War, you will find that the answer begins with rockets where fired from Gaza. And, even when you use ChatGTP you will receive a similar answer.

However, it was CNN who discovered that the Israelis started the war by breaching the six-month-long ceasefire and that no rockets were fired from Gaza. On January 13, 2009, the Israelis were forced to admit that they lied to the world.

The spread of misinformation during this war was reason to monitor all following wars on Gaza including the war which began on October 7, 2023.

But, there is a detail that even pro-Israelis don't know about an interview by the British Channel 4 with the then-spokesperson of the Israelis, the Australian migrant Mark Regev. The interview took place not far from the border and in darkness.

Regev had to face two questions:

• "Why was the International Red Cross blocked from crossing the border into Gaza to help the wounded?", and
• "Are the Israelis at war?"

His answer to the first question was avoiding answering: "We will help as much as we can and we will always cooperate with the Red Cross". But, his answer to the second question is more interesting: "We are at war in all times". 

This brings us to the pictured article here on the left which shows how readers are misled and how the Israelis put themselves as victims without telling the reader that the United Nations is not criticizing the most but warns the Israelis the most. This is a clear example of hasbara politics by Zionist, Hillel Neuer, the man behind UN Watch, at the United Nations.

We only have to look at concerns expressed by the UN over the way the Israelis were putting Gaza under siege. On October 10, 2023, the UN reported that clear evidence of war crimes had been found.

On May 7, 2021, the United Nations urged the Israelis to call off forced eviction in East Jerusalem and warned them that actions could amount to war crimes. Similar terms were also expressed during the war of 2014.

Now, why does the UN speak in terms of war crimes?

If you never have signed peace with the power you have occupied since 1967, you remain a war belligerent who is obliged to apply to the Customary International Law. Netanyahu, who on October 7, 2023 declared war on "Hamas" simply violated the UN Charter.

There's namely Article 51 in the UN Charter which reads

The State of Palestine has been accepted as an observer state of the United Nations General Assembly in November 2012. As of 2 June 2023, 139 of the 193 United Nations (UN) member states have recognized the State of Palestine. In contrast, Israel is recognized by 165.

Gaza is not a country. It is part of the State Of Palestine and entirely is under occupation.

If Palestinians are facing a kind of occupation that deprives them of continuing their existence of life,  forcing them to resist the way of occupation, by forming a group to act against their occupiers, their actions are not terrorism but resistance.

The legal part just says that the Israelis as a war belligerent cannot declare war on people they have been under occupation since 1967.

The global practice of labeling anyone as a "terrorist" just on politically motivated grounds has its roots in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon, and the hijack of a passenger plane. 

In January 2002, the then-president of the United States, George W. Bush warned Muslim countries if they harbor terrorists: "Either you with us or you with the terrorists". But Hamas emerged in 1987 when the First Intifada broke out as a response to the Israeli occupation.

Hamas is painted as a terrorist organization not just only because of the relation it has with a country that the Israelis view as their arch-enemy: Iran. The latter is a different story, namely about how the Israelis became the first and only nuclear power in the Middle East that triggered a rivalry between both.