IMPORTANT
this page is not about the ultra Israelis but about a view on the ultra Israelis
WILL THERE BE NO CHANGE ?
Let's have a look at the utterance on the left that comes from Naftali Bennet, who also labels Raisi as 'hang-man president'. This is already inaccurate as the Iranian hard-liner didn't hang anyone while being president. He just became a newly fresh "chosen" president on June 19, 2021. It becomes different when you call, for example, Kim Yong Un a 'little rocket man' (Trump) as that is correct. Because, rockets are still made under his tyranny. Zionism is an ideology that holds the creation of Jewish state, while also viewed as a movement tend to promote a certain interest, which the creation of a Jewish state is. Nationalism is an ideology that holds that the nation should be as one with the state. Some people view nationalism as a movement by saying that it tends to promote the interests of a particular nation, especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty over its homeland. This is in our view a description which tells how the ideology of nationalism is brought into practice. However, 'movement' is bringing people together to form a group in order to represent themselves as followers of a certain cause, belief, view or opinion. So, how do we view Israeli extremism? Ultraism is adjective from "ultra". In the context of this part of our series "View On A History", "ultra" is beyond what is ordinary, proper, or moderate, and is synonymous to excessive. -ism at the end is a suffix to indicate that the word represents a specific practice belonging to an ideology. You can't go beyond something if you're not fanatic in what you believe. However, your bodily system have to produce a notable amount of chemical substances to let you think, believe and behave fanatic. The more it does, the more you get extreme, which is the same to fanatic. Fanaticism is synonymous to extremism. Ultra is here the most intense form of fanaticism or extremism. Now, Zionism is roughly saying about following the cause of creating own land for your own sort of people. Nationalism is roughly saying holding 'nation' and 'state' as one. But, one cannot happen without the other. That is why we view the Israeli version of nationalism as an offshoot from Zionism. However, if you look at the parties having formed Naftali Bennett's party Yamina, you find both Zionism and nationalism but in an ultra form. About the settlements: we don't expect any change either: because of On June 4, 2021 Yesha chairman said that Yamina, New Hope lawmakers assured him construction in settlements will continue as usual, even if annexation is off the table in a unity government. But, how can one continue with the construction when annexation is off the table? The occupation is since 1967. The identity of landscape of the occupied territory have been irreversible changed in an unstoppable manner since then. This is not only a war crime because it violates the Customary International Law. In fact, there is no longer occupation in parts where the settlements are. It is already locally based annexation. You can't start building new settlements if you don't have new piece of land. Annexation just simply begins here. Starting to build is starting to change the identity of that taken piece of land while you already have annexed. So, "even if annexation is off the table" is just nonsense. Two examples. One was about foreign politics while the other was about settlements. Both show that there is actually at least no change in the political practices of the Israelis. In fact, ultra-Zionists just continue there were Netanyahu had to stop after being ousted from 12 years of polarizing politics. In December 2022, the Israelis saw Netanyahu back on political stage again. That means they have chosen for it. But his 'victory' is not that victory he had hope for. He have to deal with the ultras among the Israelis in his newly gained cabinet. That is worrisome. But, who are these ultras? They mostly live in separate towns and city neighborhoods, and unlike most secular Israelis, most are not conscripted in the military; do not work until the age of 26 and do not pay taxes. Dress code for women is like the views the mullahs and ayatollahs in Iran have and the Taliban in Afghanistan. Men do not shake hands with women, and the consumption of pork is forbidden. Ultra women do not show their hair in public after their wedding. With a headscarf or a wig – referred to in Yiddish as a sheitel – they signal to their surroundings that they are married and that they comply with notions of propriety. In the Muslim world, that means there where there's freedom of choice, wearing a headscarf, hijab or burka is because of similar notions. But, in Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan it is by repressive legislation. In their own habitat, ultras are known for openly showing aggression and violence against women who are not dressed in line with the ultras' dress code and even show openly hate against people who are not Jewish but are part of the entire Israeli society How do they view the (illegal) politics of settlements? Naftali Bennett already showed how ultras view these illegal politics. From a more nuance perspective, the explanation can be described as folows: For ultras, the settlement movement is closely tied to their "religious beliefs" and connection to -what the Jews claim as "promised land".. They often view the West Bank as part of biblical Israel and consider the establishment of Jewish communities there as fulfilling a religious and historical imperative. They see these settlements as an expression of the Jewish people's return to their ancestral homeland. But, we have showed you that their view isn't in line with biblical facts, such as the claim about Jerusalem, including the Al Aqsa compound. Because, in this chapter the Israelis themselves made clear that the habitat of the Jesubites was conquered and seized by King David. That means the ground was never Jewish but those of the Jesubites who were not Jews. So yes, the West Bank is part but of an biblical story, not part of "biblical Israel". Still, they are strong supporters of Israeli settlements and may actively participate in settling or supporting these communities. They often see this as a way to strengthen Israel's hold on the West Bank and assert their right to live there. They are also often among the most vocal opponents of any government plans to evacuate settlements in the West Bank. They may organize protests and civil disobedience to resist such actions, believing that it is their religious duty to maintain a "Jewish presence" in these areas. So, there will be no change as long there is an Netanyahu ... with or without the ultras. |
THE EXISTENCE OF ISRAELI APARTHEID
In the context of people, distinction is differentiating someone from somebody else. You do this to recognize what makes someone different from the other. It is a way to set someone aside from others or to put someone apart from others. A positive way is by excellence that sets someone apart from others. But that is not in Palestine. Now, you would raise your eyebrows when we mention 'racism' here. Racism is inherent to perception someone has towards others that leads to prejudice or antagonism against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. You put someone apart from the rest you (also) belong to. You do the same when you belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another. However, we do not view discrimination as racism. Because, discrimination is the act of unjust treatment of anyone, not only because of race but also because of person's background such as religion, sexuality, disability. But, the question is were does this all come from? In one word? Politicization. If you advocate for a land but only for your own people while other people are (still) on the land you designate as land for your own people, it is discrimination. When it is about people from another belief, it remains discrimination. But, when these people are also from a different ethnicity, discrimination is then also based on racism. You then politicize people by targeting them as unwanted for your cause. India's caste system is such example were the Dalit people and Muslims are the unwanted. That is what Zionism is all about too. Apartheid comes from the word 'apart' and may literally mean "to or on one side" or "at a distance from someone". In the context of this page, a more freely explanation is simply putting the other apart from you, which emerges in many ways. Most known example is separation which is synonymous to apartheid as you then do the same but by viewing someone as belonging to the other (side). Separation walls are just meant for such purpose: dividing an area from the other area by viewing the divided area as not being part of the other area. However, the Israelis are war belligerent and have to obliged to apply themselves to the Customary International Law. The walls in Jerusalem are in violation against the UN resolution on Jerusalem, while the walls erected across the West Bank are in violation against the Rules of Occupation as they partition the occupied territory into pieces. You can do that with roads too. That's exactly what the Israelis also do: tarmac roads for their own people and roads in poor condition for the Palestinians. A less known example are the traffic lights: longer on green for the Israelis, longer on red for the Palestinian drivers. But, roads constructed in the occupied territory are illegal as they also partition the occupied territory into pieces. And during the pandemic: unexpired vaccines for your own people, nearly to expire for the other. This reminds us to the Israeli health minister in an interview about COVID19 with CNN's Christiane Amanpour. In this talk show she asked him "Why are you not helping the Palestinians?" The Israeli answer: "We will help them after we have helped our people first". Well, that's separation or apartheid by setting the Palestinians apart to let them waiting until all of own people are vaccinated. Separation or Apartheid in the middle of a pandemic. As a war belligerent, the Israelis are obliged to apply themselves to the Fourth Geneva Convention and must ensure access to vaccines to Palestinians in the occupied territory. Israelis can or are certainly to be accused of practicing a version of Apartheid. This is not the same as saying "Israelis are practicing Apartheid" as you then need to show that you have investigated that have led to your finding. This doesn't means that you can't write about this issue. You can but it depends on how you write about it: with or without explanations. GLOSM is not an NGO, so it doesn't write in the style of an NGO. It tries to help the reader to recognize the methodology on which the Israeli Apartheid is based by providing examples the reader can recognize in every-day life. The roots of the methodology behind the Israeli Apartheid is an ideology: Zionism. Take the judiciary system, actually three systems as the third system is military. There are two different civilian judiciary systems: one for their own people, and one against the Palestinians. So is military occupation judiciary system: one for Israeli soldiers and one against Palestinians. It begins in the procedures: Emily Schaeffer Omer-Man, senior counsel at the Michael Sfard Law Office in Tel Aviv and a member of the legal team of Israeli human rights NGO Yesh Din, wrote:
Apartheid can also be read by the numbers. For example, if 91% of the investigations into ideological crimes against Palestinians were closed with no indictment filed, it means that the number of Palestinians behind the rate were treated differently, so unjust. Well, discrimination is the act of unjust treatment as a result of antagonism against Palestinians. The Israeli (war belligerent) judiciary systems are subjected to the Customary International Humanitarian Law, which regulates the legal environment of the occupied territories. The most clear visible form of separation or Apartheid is something everyone can read about or could have watched on TV: the handling of sling shooting, catapulting or throwing stones. But, the world is only familiar with images about Palestinian sling shooters, catapulters and stone throwers. However, illegal settlers in the West Bank also use slingshots, catapults and throwing stones during their attacks on Palestinian shepherds or farmers who are working on their land. In many cases you even see soldiers nearby who just stand there and watch. When Israeli right-wing extremists rally, you don't see troops deployed to crush the rally. When Israelis protest against their leaders, you don't see riot police deployed to crush the protest. But, when Palestinians protest, then you see all kind of troops deployed, who immediately start firing teargas, rubber bullets and throw stun grenades, sniping and abducting protesters while these people do the same the Israelis do: expressing their views. The Palestinians don't even need to take the initiative to express their views as this example that happens every year, shows: Passover is a Judaic ritual, the Israelis held every year during the period from April 15th to April 23rd. The Ramadan begins on April 12th and ends on May 12th every year. Every year, Israeli extremists use their ritual as a weapon to march to the compound under illegal protection by occupying forces. In the same week of the Israeli extremists' provocation in April 2021, Netanyahu threw oil on the fire by announcing the forced eviction of of Palestinian residents of Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem. Among these people also those who were already forced evicted from Haifa* during Nakba in 1948. That have angered the Palestinians at the Al Aqsa. So, they began to protest as their Ramadan was already disrupted by Israeli extremists. Israeli troops invaded the compound and started a violent crackdown. Tens of worshipers were killed, hundreds of others wounded. When this development reached Sheikh Jarrah, residents went onto the streets were they met live ammunition from Israeli troops. The military wing of Hamas warned the Israelis but they ignored the warning. The Israelis intensified the crackdown against protesters, willfully causing the escalation between May 7th and May 10th themselves, leaving Hamas no other option than to seek the only way they have to protect Palestinian people: firing rockets. That's the real roots of the 11-days war on Gaza No one have realized that the Israeli mishandling of the protests, that was triggered by Israelis themselves, and that have led to the 11-days war, is also differentiating, so setting apart the Israeli provocateurs' action from the reaction by worshipers at the Al Aqsa. The world have watched without knowing that they've witnessed an example of Apartheid.
CONCLUSION It doesn't matter how you would describe it whether you name it differentiating, separating, distincting or setting apart. There is Apartheid. It is based on ideas, perceptions and views entrenched in an ideology invented in 1897 by Theordor Herzl. The Israeli Apartheid is not the same as the one that was once in South Africa. Because, the Israeli version strives a goal that is aimed erase all references to the Palestinian existence. It is comparable to the one the Chinese are using in East Turkestan which also aims to erase all reference but to the Uyghur existence. The South African version is different because it didn't include politics that leads to annexation, assimilation and erasure. South Africa's Apartheid was only aimed to concentrate native people in designated areas in the country. It was pure based on racism while those of the Israelis is more than just about racism. |
VIEW ABOUT HOW POLARIZATION HAVE EMERGED
16. THE YEARS OF POLARIZATION
INTRODUCTION The Palestinians claim their rights. The Israelis just take the rights. But who is right? A simple question that appears to be a very complex matter. We also must not forget that the Israelis don't show any respect and often in a manner that prompts us to ask: Do the Israelis recognize international law at all? The Gaza wars have showed they don't. The systematically forced eviction to annex pieces of land on which Palestinian houses are build show the Israelis don't. The use of their army to crackdown protests while being a war belligerent show the Israelis don't. The list is endless.
(SELF) INTEREST More unhelpful, if not destructive, is when countries resort in politics that is just supporting, and are even facilitation and contribution to that what the Israelis still doing. These countries only incite the Israelis even more. That is why efforts claimed by these countries don't have any value. The efforts they think to have achieved by contributors and participants, they appear to be Jewish while others appear to have close ties with the Israelis. Take the Middle East Quartet from 2011, which was a foursome of nations and international and supranational entities involved in 'mediating' the Israeli–Palestinian peace process. Britain's former prime minister Tony Blair was the envoy of this group. In February 2008, Blair is recorded as telling the quartet that he has a good relationship with Ehud Barak who was the Israeli defense minister at that time. Much further back in time, Blair forged close ties with Michael Levy, a leader of the Jewish Leadership Council. That was in 1994. UN Watch is an entity that proclaims itself as an NGO while it openly spies, not observe, for its belligerent occupation government and makes the results public in forms of political attacks and unfounded accusations. It has a seat in the UN Human Rights Assembly but only as observer. But, there is no single other member at the assembly that operates explicit and only for itself. So, if such an entity only operates on grounds of pure religionized self-interest, it is not an NGO. Everyone can ask for a rubber stamp "NGO" on the arm. That doesn't mean you are. And while we're writing from our own perspective, it gives us this freedom to write: Organizations which are independent of government involvement are known as non-governmental organizations or non-government organizations or NGO, typically one whose purpose is to address a social or political issue. UN Watch addresses not any social issue nor any political issue. It addresses issues which represents politicization of religionized ideas. They only lead to certain sentiments against Jews but in Europe and elsewhere around the world. They don't affect the Israelis because they don't live in other parts of the world. History of the Jewish migration have showed the world that real Jews are independent from any geo-location just like the Christians, the Catholics, Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus are showing. Zionists just show that they prefer to be depended but on one single geo-location because of written, not spoken words, and as claimed being a promise. The Christians and Catholics preaches this claim too while failing to realize that it is claimed as promised but by a god with a different name. Then, Israelis don't suffer from human rights violations by their own government. Israelis don't suffer from persecutions by their own government. Israelis don't suffer from abduction, kidnapping and murder by their own government. Israelis don't suffer from hatreds because they spread hate already for decades only causing a boomerang effect which they falsely claim as "antisemitism". It is the Palestinians who suffer from human rights violations but by the Israeli occupying war belligerent. It is the Palestinians who suffer from abduction, kidnapping and murder but by the Israeli occupying war belligerent. It is the Palestinians who suffer from forced eviction, deportation and even the erasure of material references to their existence. It is the Palestinians who suffer from hate long before the Israelis came to the idea to convert the Palestinian suffering into theirs. It is the Israelis who have never stopped seeking and still continue seeking for ways of methodics to get rid of the Palestinians since Nakba in 1948. In the international political arena, it always have worked this way: if one have never been taken to account for his actions, such is an exploit to others to do the same. Now, what has the 2008-2009 war to do with Hillel Neuer? The Zionist tried to divert attention away from two things:
Neuer launched an campaign against Richard Falk who was the UN special reporteur for the oPT. Falk was appointed to investigate. As a Zionist, Neuer fiercely opposed the appointment because of Falk's made statements, comments, recommendations from the past Neuer had brandished as advocacy for the Palestinians while his own practices at the United Nations are just that but for the Israelis. In other words, Neuer's actions are to erase all references to the existence of life of the Palestinians. Advocacy is a guidance to pay attention to these references. That is something at least the Zionists don't want. That is something the supporters of the Israelis don't want. It's like the Holocaust, it must only about them. Jews who live elsewhere in the world appear totally different. Holocaust is to them not only a Jewish matter. Neuer's motive is the same a Muslim would have when another Muslims stands up against Muslims. Here, Richard Falk, who is Jewish, didn't stand up against Jews, didn't stand up against all Israelis. He stood up against certain types of Israelis like Hillel Neuer himself, Netanyahu, Naftali Bennett, Benzi Gopstein, Mark Regev and Yehuda Glick. And, like it is to a Muslim, so it is no different to Neuer: Richard Falk was a traitor and should be treated as a traitor. But, you can't behave openly that way on neutral territory, which the Headquarters of the UN Human Rights Council is. That's why Neuer submitted his raged letter to the UN in New York. Neuer just acted either because of self-interest, the interest of the Israeli war belligerent or both.
ORTHODOX JEWISH CONSPIRACY Very clear is the year 2017 when Trump in January that year his son-in-law Jared Kushner appointed to draft a Middle East 'peace plan'. Kushner is an orthodox Jew. Kushner's team members David Friedman and Jason Greenblatt, both are also orthodox Jews. And, what was their peace all about? Persuading Arab countries to side with the Israelis! These orthodox Jews were not working on the issue that is between the Israelis and the Palestinians. They were working on an issue they wanted that it is between the Israelis and Arab countries, not about and with the Palestinians. So, these orthodox Jews just ignored the Palestinians while the rest of the world failed to realize that they've witnessed an religionized conspiracy. How is that? The accords are named after Abraham, which in Islam is by the name of Ibrahim. But, Abraham was not a Jew when he was still in Ur. And, Judaism didn't exist when he was migrating with his people from Ur to Cana'an. So, do the Arab leaders know what Abraham really is to Zionists and the othodox Jews? Do they know that Abraham was the leader of the Hebrew tribe who migrated from Ur, Mesopotamia to Canaan? Do these leaders know that Abrahamic religion does not exist as Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism, which sprouted from the Jesubite's tribal belief, while Islam is an offshoot from Christianity? Then, Ur is a ancient place in today's Southern Iraq. Abraham was not native to Canaan nor the Hebrew language he and his people spoke. It is clear that the so-called Middle East peace plan was a practice of blatant conspiracy. This brings us to question how to understand these practices other than in the context of Zionism? It's like the Chinese claim over the South China Sea. It's just a claim as they never have proven that the waters are indeed Chinese. They just focus on 'China' that is included in the name. They also have never allowed anyone from outside to see for the legitimacy of the claim. No one from outside have ever seen authentic documents but copies of documents you can Google for. But you can't see whether they are authentic or have been made authentic. The Chinese also do the same the Israelis do: they start there were something about theirs is first mentioned, not there were it has its roots. The rapid manner the Chinese are fortifying the sea is like when someone knows that he or she is wrong, refused to acknowledge and resort in all methods to divert attention away from what is wrong. But, there's more falsehood about the pact: There was never any war with Bahrain and the UAE. Both countries only didn't recognize the Israelis until their signing of the pact. So, there wasn't even a political war. See more under incitement.
POLITICIZATION Politicization is history's biggest enemy as it incites manipulation, falsification and even to mystification. The result is then a rewrite similar to what we do with movies. In modern times it goes like this: Start your computer. Open the video editor. Click on 'files' and look where you have the video that carries the title 'History Of Palestine'. Load it. Cut the whole period from the prehistory to the scene prior to the scene depicting "King David starting to build his city, he named Jerusalem". Delete it. Move the rest of the movie back to the beginning Save it and post it online. But, you can also do the same in writing like it is found done in Wikipedia where you can edit entries the way you want. Our computer story is just to illustrate. Politics is like that but starts in your mind. But it is not the internet. It is the tools needed to have access to the internet and tools you need to alter on the internet to begin with your laptop or desktop pc. That's how technology is used for example by the Zionist group CAMERA to whom Naftali Bennett, a high tech (!) billionaire, is linked to. As we wrote earlier the so-called UN-Watch is another source that distributes mystification. But its activities have nothing to do with the position as an observer. Neuer openly sneaks to cherry pick he views as "against Israelis". The results are released in forms of political attacks and unfounded accusations. Nothing in the world occurs to happen on its own. Something always needs something either to occur to happen or to become to exist. So it is the existence of something the Israelis brandish as terrorism and terrorists while blatantly ignoring the roots. The silencing of the roots is the main tread that goes through all rhetoric even about terrorism and terrorists, the ancestors of today's Israelis have introduced themselves. Disseminating politics the Israelis use is therefore no other than to divert attention away. But, they resort in more ways.
MOTIVE Polarizing is to cause something, especially something that contains different people or opinions, to divide into two completely opposing groups. It's actually setting up people against one other. But, to set up people against one other, you need something that causes people being against one other. A motive. Netanyahu showed his motive on January 10, 2009 when he said during an interview with CNN that Hamas must be destroyed. The question is how to bring a motive like those of Netanyahu into reality? Just fabricate allegations, accusations, claims and other falsehood. On June 19, 2008 Hamas and the Israelis agreed to a ceasefire. As part of the ceasefire, Palestinian militants agreed to immediately halt their attacks on Israel and Israel agreed to cease its military operations in Gaza. However, on November 5, 2008 the Israelis intruded Gaza to carry out an attack after they claimed that Hamas had fired rockets. The Israelis defended the attack this way:
First, the remark contains the word "pinpoint" that is copied from John Kerry who accused the Israelis of having carried out such attack: "That is pinpoint. That is pinpoint attack", John Kerry angrily said while leaving his press conference. The media where witnesses because the microphone stood open. During the press conference, the Israelis targeted an apartment building in Gaza City resulting in many casualties among the residents. The remark but copied and used by the Israelis is disseminated language or hasbara and is meant to divert attention away from the fact that the Israelis have breached the cease fire. On December 27, 2008 the war broke out. However, CNN found out that Hamas didn't fire any rocket. On November 14, 2012, Hamas leader Ahmed al-Jabari was assassinated by an Israeli missile air strike. Hamas retaliated by firing rockets. The Israelis counter-reacted by launching air strikes. A war became an reality but ended a week later. But, in September 2012 President Obama had just began a new peace talk process, which have led in full talks between Mahmoud Abbas and the then foreign minister Tzipi Livni, led by US Secretary of State John Kerry. Netanyahu agreed to the release of Palestinian (political) prisoners in four phases. Two phases completed without any problem. The third phase triggered protest among the Israelis who opposed the release of these prisoners. The protest put a pressure on Netanyahu. On April 3, 2014 he decided not to release the 4th and last batch of Palestinian prisoners. The whole peace process was jeopardized and triggered anger and protests in the West Bank.
INCITEMENT The term 'settlement' is synonymous to colonization as it is about the inhabitation of a piece of land by your own people. In fact, you need to take a piece of land from someone else first before you can colonize. It is called land grab (of that piece of land). But, that is a term you use in time of peace. Israelis are still war belligerent. The United Nations wouldn't speak in terms of "mounting to war crimes" if the Israelis have had declare their stage of war as lifted, which they still haven't done yet. So, they are not with peace thus their actions are annexation. Earlier on this page we wrote about the orthodox Jewish "peace pact", which is also a way of fueling incitement which resulted in their following achievement: On September 15, 2020 the UAE and Bahrain were the first Gulf countries who signed the American orthodox-Jewish pact. The Israelis agreed to delay settlement plans under its normalization deal with the UAE, something Emirati officials have cited in response to Arab and Muslim criticism. However, on October 15, 2020 the Israeli human rights watchdog, Peace Now reported that more than 3,000 West Bank settlement homes were approved, making it a total of 12,000 of these illegal homes that year alone. And on January 17, 2021 another 2,500 illegal settler homes were approved. It shows that the Israelis are not negotiators but false, distrustful actors. On April 7, 2021 Netanyahu announced the forced eviction of Palestinians from Sheik Jarrah. Such announcements have always incite right-wing settlers like this example shows about an ultra-Zionist, speaking English with an American accent who just walked into a Palestinian house in this East Jerusalem neighborhood. The incident took place on May 5, 2021 during the Passover provocation at the Al Aqsa mosque that influenced the situation in Sheik Jarrah as it triggered a protest forced eviction Netanyahu had announced during the settler provocation.. The Israelis, however, are war belligerent as they are constantly reminded to when the United Nations warn that forced evictions and demolitions amounts to war crimes. Forced eviction and demolition are to achieve the goal of erasing the Palestinian existence. The Israelis regularly claim that targeted buildings were constructed without permit. However, the policy of permits violates the treaty laws on occupation. If we look at the ways the Israelis have resorted in Gaza wars, and if we look at the unstoppable forced evictions and demolitions, we see that the Israelis just simply ignore the fact that they are subjected to treaty laws. The way the Israelis ignore international laws proofs that they simply don't recognize these laws for the simply reason that they are an obstruction to the Israeli achievement to seize as much as possible. This is a war crime as it is forbidden to create a new nation inside the occupied nation or to expand by creating new parts of territory. If own people are encourage to contribute, it echoes in the way they do: incited uprooting of Palestinians from their homes to take the houses over, incited destruction of Palestinian farmlands, incited throwing of rocks on parked Palestinians cars, even incited killing of Palestinians. Incitement don't need explicit to come from their leaders. Influence from outside can also contribute to (more) fueling of incitement such as via lobbyists who either are Israelis themselves or those who lobby on behalf of the Israelis. It is assimilation into the political sovereignty of countries and their people :
We wrote in '(self) interest', which is one of the elements in Netanyahu's era of polarization, about Jared Kushner's Middle East 'peace plan', and that his team members David Friedman and Jason Greenblatt are also orthodox Jews. Well, the premeditation of forming such a group not only hallmarks collective religious hate against an selected group of people from another religion. The group also incites actions against the targeted group of people. On February 21, 2021 the UAE decided to drastically reduce its funding to the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees in 2020, the year it signed the orthodox-Jewish brokered normalization accord with the Israelis that was heavily criticized by the Palestinian Authority. But, this is not an isolated case. It has its roots: It is not a secret that the Israeli hard-liners have the desire to exterminate the entire Palestinian existence. It is to many in the world a secret that these Israelis treat everyone, and everything in Palestine as terrorists, and those who oppose the Israelis as antisemitist. So, every aid from outside is seen is an attempt to help the Palestinians to survive. In relation to Gaza, the Israelis even run a calorie scheme, discovered in October 2012, to keep the affected people barely alive. The Israelis tried to keep the practice secret as it would cost these hardliners their friendship when the US finds out that they let Gazans just starving to death. That is why Netanyahu on January 7, 2018 said that he wanted UNRWA gradually to be shut down. Eight months later Trump decided to stop the funding.
PROVOCATION Provocation is by influence that causes incitement to provoke like this example shows. Passover is a Judaic ritual, the Israelis held every year during the period from April 15th to April 23rd. The Ramadan begins on April 12th and ends on May 12th every year. Provocateurs "passover" the terrain of the Al Aqsa compound in the exact period when Passover and Ramadan overlapse each other, every year under illegal protection by occupying forces. However, "Passover" have nothing to do with any temple nor with anything on the Al Aqsa compound. It refers to this explanation:
In the quote "Israelites" are pictured as if they are Jews. They were a tribe, not slaves, which came from the south and entered the territory of the Amelekite tribe. There is no hard conclusive evidence found showing that this tribe were the people who followed Moses during his during encircling the Sinai desert then into northern direction as detailed in many Judaic claims. There is even no hard conclusive evidence found showing how that Moses' journey was the way as claimed.
Stories about the Israelites, that means from where in the south did they come from, have never been exact detailed. We only know that they where driven out by the Amelekites into northern direction, according to found details to the land of King David who in return drove the Israelites out into the direction of the hills where the Jesubite tribe resided.
Then, Israeli provocateurs are to be accused of misusing their own belief for destructive purpose that amounts to that what Jihad is known for.
'Jihad' means revenge, retaliation or religious war.
History of the settler provactions have showed that their actions always lead to brutal crackdown, illegal abductions, wounded and deaths among Palestinians when they try to defende themselves.
Like exploiting of Holocaust, the Israelis exploit the self-defense by the Palestinians by claiming they've been attacked. But it becomes polarized when countries who are part of the problem utterly say "The Israelis have the right to defend themselves".
Note: The original version contains embedded videos which we cannot publish due to limited webspace. |
Important:
this page is not about the blockade but about a view on the occupation.
HOW GAZA BECAME UNDER ISRAELI CONTROL
Before the Israelis started to "control" Gaza it was under Egypt until that war when the Israelis seized the strip along with several other important areas of land. The Israelis then began to expand their territory beyond the internationally recognized borders of their territory. There were 21 settlements in Gaza under the occupier's administration of the Hof Aza Regional Council. The land was allocated in such a way that each Israeli settler disposed of 400 times the land available to the Palestinian refugees, and 20 times the volume of water allowed to the peasant farmers of Gaza. The first settlement was Kfar Darom, which was originally established in 1947, and reformed in 1970. However, in 1956, the then president of Egypt, Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the French-British Suez Company that controlled the Suez Canal. Paris and London wanted the strategic water way back but were eager to start a war themselves. Both countries sought contact with the Israelis to ask them for help. In fact, France and Britain were asking the Israelis to start a war for them. That's how Gaza became into Israeli hands. In 2003, Ariel Sharon proposed the withdrawal from Gaza in the wake of a peace agreement between the Israelis and Egypt. That agreement have led to the dismantling of settlements in the Sinai.. Sharon's proposal came into effect in 2005 with the dismantling of the 21 settlements. The dismantling didn't take place without resistance by settlers. In 1987, several Palestinians were killed by an Israeli driver. The car attack, not an accident as altered by CAMERA in WIkipedia, triggered the First Intifada, a Palestinian uprising against Israeli West Bank and Gaza occupation. led Yassin and six other Palestinians to found Hamas. In 2006, Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections and assumed administrative control of Gaza Strip and West Bank. In response, Egypt and the Israelis blockade Gaza by closing the land borders, preventing air traffic from and to Gaza and by stopping all maritime traffic into the territorial waters of Gaza. Hamas supposed to be viewed the way the Zealots from the 1st-century are described: resistance as they assassinated collaborators with Roman rule in the province of Judea. So, the first terrorists were East European Jewish migrants from Poland and Belarus who formed the Stern group to attack the British. The group is also responsible for the ambush and murder of the UN diplomat, the Swedish count Folke Bernadotte. The terror attack is the roots of the rush invention of "Israelis" in 1948. The definition of 'terror' is extreme fear. 'ism' at the end of the word 'terror' is a suffix to indicate that 'terror' represents acts and activities related to causing extreme fear, while 'terrorizing' is the act with the aim to cause extreme fear. The word 'terrorism' refers to methodologies on which the use of terror is based. Anyone who resort in acts and activities with the intention to cause extreme fear, that person is a terrorist. But, when two or more people form, or people join the forming of a group with the intention to cause extreme fear, they are members of a terror group, not a terrorist group as that is a political popularized term. Political popularization of "terrorism" have led to misuse, even to exploit since US President George W. Bush on September 20, 2001 introduced 'war on terror' during his speech to the Congress. Canada, the European Union, Israelis, Japan and the United States have designated Hamas as a terrorist organization. Australia, New Zealand, Paraguay and the United Kingdom have designated only its military wing as a terrorist organization (as of 2021). It is not considered a terrorist organization by Brazil, China, Egypt, Iran, Norway, Qatar, Russia, Syria and Turkey. In December 2018, the United Nations General Assembly rejected a U.S. resolution condemning Hamas as a terrorist organization. The question rises when is it legitimate to label an entity as an terror organization?
Well, Hamas is not residing in the Israeli territory nor is that territory in a time of peace as the Israelis never lifted the stage of war since 1967. That is why the United Nations still consider the Israelis as war belligerent. So, labeling Hamas as a "terrorist organization" is purely based on policies which hallmark support to Zionist politics against Hamas, not with criteria as written above. Israelis are simply known for their chronic lack of distinction as distinction is a threat to their policies in how to engage public relation (hasbara) . Now let's go back to the question: is it a blockade or an occupation? Blockade is an act, normally carried out in times of war whereby one party blocks entry to or departure from a defined part of an enemy's territory, most often its coasts. However, we have seen that there can be a blockade in time of peace like Qatar had to face by Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the UAE who started it all by launching a smear campaign that was mastermind by its ambassador to the US, Youself al-Otaiba. The issue? Qatar's regional policies which aren't those of the other GCC member states. Blockades are regulated by international law and custom and require advance warning to neutral states and impartial application. In international legal language:
Well, Gaza does no longer have an operational airport since the radar station and control tower were destroyed on December 4, 2001 and the runway was cut by Israeli bulldozers on January 10, 2002. Then, there is no Israeli presence at any port entrance of Gaza's harbors. So, what is it? A blockade? Compare it with preventing everyone from entering and leaving a house (means Gaza) as you do that by positioning yourself outside the house and in front of the garden (means Gaza waters) of the house in order to allow some free movement of those who are (still) inside. But that is not what the Israelis do. Just watch this example filmed by the Italian activist Rosa Schiano on September 3, 2012. She wrote:
Her writing reveals that the Israelis were not outside the garden and blocking the entrance to the house. They're in the garden (means Gaza waters) with the fence (means Gaza's maritime border) behind them. That what she mentioned as "Jericho Agreements" is a set of paperwork of something that is just a simple line drawn across the garden to limit the movement of people who live in the house (means Gaza). That is not blockading while you're in the garden. You just do two things: occupying the garden (means Gaza waters) while limiting the movement in the garden. On the clickable map it is actually this: In fact, the created situation, even with agreements and accords, is similar to the occupation in the West Bank but without annexation. So, in our view it is scalable maritime border occupation. The motive to falsely name it a blockade is to prevent Hamas from exploring a gas field that is in their waters but behind the Jericho Agreement Line.
|
Important:
this page is not about genocide but about a view on the question.
IS IT GENOCIDE ?
The Israelis are a war belligerent. How do we know that? Well, actually everyone could have known if they did understand the United Nations when they issues warnings to the Israelis, that actions could amount to war crimes. You don't use 'war crimes' when nobody is in a stage of war. The Israelis never have lifted the stage of war since 1967. The reason why they never have lifted is simple to explain to one thing: they're just not finished with annexation. That is why the Israelis never provided their official borders to the UN. Unlike what is generally viewed, we distinct war violation and war crime from each other. WIn our view, war violation refers to breaches against protocols and/or rules while war crimes refers to unlawful acts to willfully cause damage and destruction during time of war. For instance: If the occupying power thinks it needs to own a piece of land, so it takes it with the aim to transfer own people -even foreign citizens- to the taken land that is in the occupied territory, both are a war violation as they breach the Rules Of Occupation Building a settlement for these people is a breach of the Rules of Usufruct specific to the Rules Of Occupation as it permanently changes the environmental identity of that piece of land in the territory that is under occupation. When the occupying power finds objects and structures, which are either part of the identity of the occupied land, or are objects needed to have an locally based existence, and decides to remove them in order to replace with its own, it is a breach to the same rules. When all the before mentioned is systematically, that it hallmarks the existence of a used program, raising the suspicion that the program is meant to stop the continuation of life but across the entire occupied territory, we then have a serious problem especially when occupation military is involved in the achievement. Because, the planning of the locations of settlements is by an military unit. That is what found photos reveal which were taken on construction sites where military officers were seen acting as if they are verifying construction plans.
EXISTENCE. In short: it means your physical presence, your being, you but 'confirmed' visually by the eyes of anyone who sees you. However, existence has a broader meaning as it is actually an umbrella term encompassing everything that is needed to exist, not to mention to continue to exist. Among those belonging to 'everything' are your roots and ancestry, your tradition, your culture, your native language and your belief. They all are elements belonging to your identity. Material belongings are your house, your property even the whole town or city or neighborhood if not your land as a country were you belong to. Then we have life, which includes food, water, electricity, health, communication and the availability to have a place to stay. This all is existence. Erasing all references to the existence of life with the aim to end its continuation doesn't directly need to include making an direct end to psysical life. This can also gradually by a program, a policy, doctrine or directive. We're then dealing with cultural genocide. But, if the above also includes systematically causing casualties among those who are members of another nation*, ethnicity* and another religion* as well damaging and destroying references to these people's existence, either in whole or in part, we won't support the view of war crimes nor crimes against humanity.
Read more at "There Will Be No Change".
*)
**) click on any of the images to enlarge.
|
Important:
this page is not about ancestory but about a view on a ancestory.
WHAT IS AN ARAB ISRAELI ?
In chapter "No historical continuity / part 1: Genetic roots", we have tried to give you an idea how science is failing to realize that they are studying how the Jews have lost their historical continuity. We also wrote that Jews and Palestinians, that means those Palestinians who never migrated from their homeland thus not from a settler or colonial population, have their roots via extensively mixing between Egyptians, Mesopotamians, and Anatolians. Two aspects which make studying genetics of these people in another way very interesting, namely on the question "Why do a lot of today's Israelis show an behavior, a way of thinking, and a way of acting that are like Arabs."? The answer is in the person of the Israelis as we know that there are two types of Israeli men. However, the world only knows one type: those who look like Caucasian. They are the descendants of Caucasian Jews who came from outside Palestine such as during the two migrations from Europe and illegal crowdfunding that is still taking place . But, today's Caucasian Jews may either have their parents from a similar root or they are migrants who have illegally settled in the West Bank. It is very important to know that there were no Caucasian Jews until the first migration to Ottoman Palestine between 1881 and 1903. The much lesser known Israeli type is pictured above. Israeli men but those as pictured have a look which is quiet similar to Arab men. Assume that they're Arab, then their genetics could lead back to the very forefathers from the time when people in Canaan started mixing with one other. Among those people should also include Arabic people who migrated from north, from the east and from the south of Canaan. Today, Arab Israeli men look like this:
So, when interracial mixing began, so began the passing of genetic material containing codes including those of characters of personality. Every birth goes that way. You have something from your father and something from your mother. However, you may also have something that is passed on to your father and mother, and then passed on to you. And so do you when you start a family yourself. That is actually what genetic continuity is all about. With all respect to Arabic people, but Arabic men are generally known for their impulsivity, extreme emotion, and uncontrollability. Elements which always lead to instant aggressiveness, which in return makes it very easy to resort in violence or worse. The element of uncontrollability is the roots of loosing touch with reality, which in return is the cause of having no single sense of reasonableness. It leads to extreme emotion with the result lack of self-reflection and self-accountability. That explains self-pitying and self-victimizing. All these elements are in the codes of genetic material that has been passed on for thousands and thousands of years. It is no different to those who are Arab Israelis, especially when you look at the fact that there's interracial engagement between Arab Israelis and Caucasian Israelis (photo below). And so they pass on the elements from one to the other. Now you have an idea why we view the Arab Israelis and the Caucasian Israelis as no other than similar to those in neighboring countries. Why do we name them "Arab Israelis"? This is because there is already something that is called "Israeli Arabs" which refers to the citizenship given to Arabs who are allowed to live among the Israelis. However, no one have the same quantity of genetic material and therefore the intensity of characters of personality differs from person to person as it is like what you have from your father and mother. You may have a little bit more from your father and a little bit less from your mother while the rest is you. Another variant may look like a lot from your mother, few from your father, an amount that is passed on to your father or mother then passed on to you while the rest is you. And so there are numerous variants. That all is genetically defined. |
Important:
this page is not about conflict but about a view on the use of 'conflict'.
IS THERE A CONFLICT?
As we wrote on our very first page, there are a lot of websites that are driven by politics, politicization and even religionization, which divert readers attention away from what's really behind. It is not politics, politicization nor religionization. It all have to do with evolution in which 'things' occur to happen one after the other. That also includes the way involved people became to be from the beginning to the present time of today. Genetic material in people play a crucial role in how 'things' are going to happen. A question: What is 'territory'? Well, there are various ways to answer, from abstract to define in international legal terms and everything in between. We keep it by an explanation you're best familiar with: Territory is something like a piece of land that is fenced off to keep everyone out who doesn't belong on this land. You may have a house with a surrounding garden. But, you fence it off to send the message "this is my piece of land" or "I'm the owner of this land". It is a simple explanation for something, which origin is not by humans. It was already there .... in nature. Animals are familiar with 'territory' as they mark the boundaries their territory by instinct but with the same intention you have: sending the message to tell what's yours. The first signs of permanent settlement was when humans began to domesticate plants and animals. That was some 10,000 years ago. But, you need to have something to keep the animals. So, our very first farmers used stakes they pour into the ground the way as pictured. In archeological terms, stakes are called palisades, which were used just to protect their domesticated animals from being stolen, not to send the message that it is their land. That became to change when humans wanted to expand their presence but in the territory of other humans. The way they did is by the way they where*, the way they thought and the way they're used to do things. But, there are many reasons to seek for expansion, so not just only because of more space. And, there are even combinations behind such domination and possession, which has been in our lives since the biblical ages. Humans not only have always brought their physical presence with them but also what's inside the physical presence*. It's here were religion has its roots. But, before we continue we need to know what exactly means 'religion'. On the internet you will find:
However, in our view religion is not any deliberation as they lead to views or opinions especially when they are meant to push for a cause that leads to some sort of separatism, better known as offshoots, or that leads to doctrines such as Islamism and Zionism. The way how they (have) separate from whatever plays a crucial role as incitement is a way to influence. For example: On this webpage we found a quote from the founder of modern Zionism*, Theodor Herzl:
On that same webpage we found from another Zionist, David Ben Gurion in 1938
The first statement is clear exploiting anti-Semitism. Jews didn't flee for that reason. They fled Russia because there was a revolution. The second statement is exploiting the refugee crisis prior to WWII, but to incite. Both statements were meant in order to influence with the intention to gain authority. They are the earliest traces in modern history showing that it is not about a conflict with the Palestinians. You need to view from a much different perspective, those of collective behavior. So, we view it as a psychological struggle triggered by a phantom fear of extinction as a result of exaggerated imaginary. This in return has its roots in paranoia. Add the elements of extreme emotion and uncontrollability and you have all the ingredients needed to understand the violent and aggressive way of thinking the Israelis have, resulting in brutal, often bloody acts of today. In other words: it's all about expansion to 'survive' (lebensraum) by building upon seized native existence just like what King David did thousands of years ago.
*) Zionism was already in 1879 by means of European migrants who were building small settlements in Palestine.
|
Important:
this page is not about history but about a view on a history.
WHO IS REALLY INDIGENOUS ? (and the misuse of antisemitism by (pro-) Israelis)
The Israelis also try to protect and preserve their cause in another way: falsifying, mystifying and denying. It goes like this: On June 9, 2020 Netanyahu uttered the terms "invented Palestinians" and "indigenous Jews". That is a disgusting copy as it has its origin to the person of the American republican hardliner Newt Gingrich. That brings us the question: what is 'indigenous'? In non-institutionalized definition, 'indigenous' is adjective and refers to the notion of a place-based human ethnic culture that has not migrated from its homeland, and is not a settler or colonial population. Merriam Webster dictionary explains 'indigenous' as the earliest known inhabitants of a place and especially of a place that was colonized by a now-dominant group The institutionalized definition about 'indigenous' as written by the United Nations:
The basis is poor as the 6 points are completely vague and open for any interpretation. The second point is even an attempt to falsify the chronology inherent to historical continuity. Self-identification is an autonomous act but leads to inaccuracy when it comes to "Jew" and "Israeli". "Jew" adjective to a religion that sprouted as an offshoot from another belief. while "Israeli" is adjective to the results forthcoming from developments that have led to the invention in 1948. The roots is the assassination of a UN diplomat in September 1948, which in return has its roots in the invasion of the Zionist migrants in 1947, which in return is a continuation from the early 1900s. Any continuity is about the continuation of a cycle of events over an immeasurable period of time, and the recognition of events as inseparably interconnected. So it is when we speak about historical continuity. However, the cycle didn't start to run by the assassination. It was running for thousands and thousands of years. But, not every event belongs to a certain historical continuity as they may have their roots in another continuity. For instance, the migration from Eastern Europe in 1905 was not by ethnic related cycle. There was a revolution in Russia, which prompted Russian Jews to flee. The migration from Central and Eastern Europe in 1947 was even by an religionized political invention in 1897, Zionism. So it is when we look at the continuity from a biblical perspective. If we focus on what is biblical written, then there were two groups of people who entered Canaan. The first group are written as those freed from slavery and were led by Moses (in Islam, Musa). The other group are written as those who migrated from Mesopotamia and were led by Abraham (in Islam: Ibrahim). This means that there are two historical continuities: one that started in Egypt and the other in Mesopotamia. So, according to our understanding, there is no proven historical continuity that relates modern-day Jews to the people, documented by historians as led by Moses, because there is no evidence found in the Sinai. There's also no historic continuity that relates the Jews with the Abrahamic tribe as the first Jews have no roots in Mesopotamia were the Abrahamic tribe came from (see map). Interesting is this: 'Hebrew' appears to be adjective to the Abrahamic people as a tribe, and who are named after the language they spoke: Hebrews. This indicates that the Hebrew language is not native to Canaan but to the region were Abraham came from, Ur in today's Iraq Then this, if we connect any historic continuity to the Israelites, to whom the Israelis liken themselves with by linking them with the victory on the conquest of Jebus by King David, the question rises how did David became king of these tribe while he had his kingdom far north and away from the territory now known as the Negev Deser. A desert that was inhabit by the Amalekites. The people who entered the territory of the Amalekites from the south, by Jews described as Israelites, these people ended up in the territory of King David who drove them out into the direction of the hills of Jebus. But, the Jews still connect the Israelites with King David's seizure of Jebus, now Jerusalem as their way of documenting insinuates that the Israelites have fought with the king to seize Jebus. It's quiet illogical to document the Israelites first as driven out by King David, as we found in several referrals, then let modern-day people believe that the driven people have a link in the rebuilding of Jebus but as King David's city. And, if we translate it to modern times, those who stood at the beginning (1948-1960s), they also don't have any historical continuity that sprouted in Palestine:
So, anyone who speaks in terms of 'invented people' they have invented themselves as 'Israelis' have no historical continuity as it didn't sprout in Palestine. It is a naming enforced to accept by others. That enforcement was by assassinating the Swedish UN diplomat Folke Bernadotte in an ambush, carried out by Shamir, not by Cohen. It is the roots of Sweden's policy on Palestine. *) In Wikipedia, details of involvment by 'Yitzak Shamir' has been altered in 'Cohen" by US-based Zionist group CAMARA On September 24, 2020 BESA published an article in an attempt to explain its readers something that didn't exist: "Why Arabs Hate The Palestinians". The article was published amid Jarred Kushner's regional destabilizing actions to persuade Gulf states to take side with the Israelis. The headlined question was an attempt to let the English reading Arabs believe that the course for an own Palestinian state was to blame. Hasbara, which is the basis the Israelis and their supporters use in their 'communication' with the outside world, is described as a reference to public-relations efforts to disseminate positive information abroad about the Israelis and their actions, whereby dissemination is scattering or spreading widely, as though sowing seed disseminate ideas. However, it is actually a practice to deflect attention away from that what is initially the issue. In plain words: Israelis and their supporters don't want you to talk about what should or must be talked about: the essence of the matter, not whatever is achieved. It is an kind of robbing you from the right of freedom of expression by accusing you of "anti-Semitism". But, who and what is Semitic? The Spanish language was distributed via colonization that began with the Spanish Conquest of the Americas in 1519. The Spaniards not only brought their language to the continent but also their religion and culture. When the Spaniards engaged interracial relationship, they became the ancestors for all later ancestors who then became the ancestors of today's Central and South American people. That doesn't mean that today's people, who now have Spanish as their 'native language', and have their religion from the Spanish, are Spanish originated people. It is exact the same to the Hebrew language when it was first distributed across Southern Europe and from there into the rest of Europe. When Palestine became a Roman empire province, Jews who have fled also distributed their language, religion and culture. They are the first ancestors of all later ancestors of ancestors of today's Jews in Europe. This doesn't mean that today's Jews in Europe are Semitic people. They are not. Nor are they originated to Semitic people as their ancestries sprouted in Europe. The map on the right isn't only showing the reason of a migration. It also shows the result of migration, namely the distribution of the Hebrew language, Jewish religion and culture between 1850 and 1914 and reminds us to the map of the Spanish with the difference that the map below is not about a conquest. The Israelis from the old generation are originated from those during the migration while the young Israeli generation have parents who are the children of the old generation who in return are the children of the migrants generation. In the 21st century, Jews in Palestine are from all corners of the world mostly via illegal crowd funding by the Jewish Agency For Israel, which presents itself as a non-government organization, a title misused as the Israelis are occupying belligerents. So, how can anyone be accused of anti-Semitism when Semitism is factual about indigenous Semitic people. These people do no longer live and that for ages. What is practiced in the 21st century, when whoever views criticism against Jews in Europe as anti-Semitism, it is ripping Semitism completely out of its historical context. |
Important:
this page is not about history but about a view on a history.
EXPLOITING A WAR
The Nazi's need of Eastern Europe as 'lebensraum' was covered by Hitler's propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels who instigated and incited Jew hatred by holding series of speeches full with falsehood and other lies. But, don't we all know similar developments in our present time? Yes, we do but there are too many among us who pretend these developments as they do not exist. Well, they do! Here are 54 quotes: The oldest example is only known by people who are familiar with the history about how the Israelis became the first in the introduction of military use of nuclear material in the Middle East.: During the mid-summer of 1960, an American corporate official was talking to U.S. diplomats in Tel Aviv while sharing information about construction activities near Dimona. The diplomats documented the conversation in a cable they send to Washington. John F. Kennedy immediately wanted explanation about the activities. But the Israelis repeatedly provided less than credible answers. It was the site of a textile factory, the Israelis said. Well, not quiet a lie because there was such factory there. But, when the Americans demanded a visit to the site, the Israelis turned aggressive. The Israeli leader David Ben Gurion felt the pressure that came from John F. Kennedy's administration. He had to say something. So he came with this: ".. to prevent a second Holocaust from happening". The documentation of the cables and other files on the Israeli nuclear issue are here. In September 1950, the Germans signed a agreement to pay a sum of 3 billion marks over the next fourteen years; 450 million marks were paid to the World Jewish Congress. The payments were made to the Israelis -who just had their name since three years- as the heir to those victims who had no surviving family. So, 450 million marks paid to an organization that is traditionally deeply rooted in almost all strategic economical and financial position worldwide. In April 2015, the then FBI director James Comey wrote in an Washington Post article:
This is a clear insinuation against Poland as "murderers and accomplices" is also a description against that country. Comey's remark is also an accusation against the Polish for being responsible for the concentration camps in Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Treblinka. Comey ignores the fact that Poland was invaded and occupied by the Nazis on September 1, 1939. That's two days before Britain and France declared war on the Nazis. Poland also became the first country under control but by two powers acting in accordance with the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Germany acquired 48.4% of the former Polish territory. Comey's remark shows amateurism in the history of the Second World War as it is heavily influenced by the pro-Zionist stance the US has for decades. In 2016, the Israelis demanded compensation from Poland that must have been inspired by remarks and statement such as of James Comey. But in Poland, conservatist Jaroslaw Kaczynski did the same but from Germany. That would sound logical as the country was taken by the Nazis (and the Soviets). Still, Polish right-wing groups protested against Germany as it didn't compensate Poland the way the Israelis are, who didn't exist during the war. The Germans never provided a proper explanation. Germany vows to stand with the Israelis despite the Holocaust. But as said before, the Israelis don't have an historical link to the war. East European Jewish migrant just gave themselves the adjective in 1948. That's three years after the war. The map below suppose to bring awareness that we have to talk about two different groups of migrants: those who left during the rise of Nazism in Germany, which the map shows, and those who left during the rise of Zionism which spread from Austria, Germany to Britain. That was in 1947. Those who became Israelis in 1948, they were the first converted Zionists who were already in Palestine since 1947. No Jews arrived there because they all went the the Americas while smaller numbers went to other regions of the world. And those the Israelis consider as Holocaust survivors, their historical continuity as such survivor ends when leaving for a place outside Europe. The Holocaust just simply didn't happen in Palestine. The Israeli demand has simply no relation to the war but with, what we call the "Zionization of the Second World War" as the Israelis made it as an inseparable part of the "1948 event'. That's were the Israeli hunt for compensations come from. Exploiting of the Second World War is just part of the Israeli Zionist survival strategy. That is why the Israelis use a protocol for foreigner leaders when they come to visit, and that systematically includes a "ceremony" at Yadvashem to send visiting leaders the message "you should put us first" as if the whole world is responsible for something that took place in Europe but by the Israelis has been hijacked to use it for their own (Zionist) cause. What strikes us so deeply is that you will never hear from the Israelis, that the highest number of Jews, killed by the Nazis, is in the Netherlands. Three quarter of the Jewish community in that country just uprooted. Jews who never came to the ideas to leave their country for a Zionist cause. However, exploiting the war has also other dimensions: In July 2015, the then republican candidate Mike Huckabee said to the right-wing outlet Breibart:
He made this utter remark to express his opposition against the JCPOA agreement that was signed on July 14th by the so-called P5+1 on the Iranian nuclear program. In October 2015, Netanyahu have accused the Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem during W.W.II, Haj Amin al-Husseini, of causing the Holocaust and "fomenting the final solution" while giving a speech at the World Zionist Conference in Jerusalem.
|
Important
This page is not about history but about a view on a history
NO HISTORICAL CONTINUITY PART 2. INVENTION BY TERRORISM
On December 10, 2011, the American hardline republican Newt Gingrich said this: “I think that we’ve had an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs, and who were historically part of the Arab community. And they had a chance to go many places, and for a variety of political reasons we have sustained this war against Israel now since the 1940s, and it’s tragic.” In an angerily response, the spokesman for the then American Task Force on Palestine, Hussein Ibish, said: “There was no Israel and no such thing as an “Israeli people” before 1948. So the idea that Palestinians are ‘an invented people’ while Israelis somehow are not is historically indefensible and inaccurate. Such statements seem to merely reflect deep historical ignorance and an irrational hostility towards Palestinian identity and nationalism.” On December 4, 2020 Tzipi Hotovely, on that day the new ambassador to the UK, said in her first speech that Nakba is "a very strong and very popular Arab lie." She added that the displacement of Palestinians since 1948, is "a made up story". Hotovely is known to us as a Zionist with an appalling record of racist and inflammatory misbehavior. It is not the first time that stubborn hardline Israelis come with utterances but after American hardline idiots have done already. So it is about the rhetoric "Hamas is a terrorist organization" Lehi is better known as the Stern Gang, and was a Zionist terrorist group founded by Avraham Stern in British Mandatory Palestine. Its avowed aim was to evict the British authorities from Palestine by use of violence, allowing unrestricted immigration of Jews and the formation of a Jewish state, a "new totalitarian Hebrew republic". Avraham Stern, Yitzhak Shamir, Nathan Yellin-Mor were the three leaders. Stern and Shamir were both Zionist migrant from Poland while Zionist Yellin-Mor migrated from Belarus. So, none of them where indigenous people of Palestine. The group split from the Irgun militant group in 1940 in order to continue fighting the British during World War II. Lehi initially sought an alliance with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, offering to fight alongside them against the British in return for the transfer of all Jews from Nazi-occupied Europe to Palestine. On May 29, 1948, the Zionist migrants rooted government formally disbanded Lehi. However ... At the end of May 1948 Count Folke Bernadotte received a telegram from the UN Secretary-General Trygve Lie with an inquiry if Bernadotte would be willing to undertake the mission of acting as the UN’s mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Folke Bernadotte thereby became the UN’s first official mediator in the organization’s short history. Folke Bernadotte proceeded to formulate a proposal for a more sustainable solution to the conflict, and drafted a roadmap to peace. According to the plan the formerly British mandate Palestine should become a union between Jews and Arabs, where the Jewish part would consist of Israel and the Arabic part would consist of the Kingdom of Transjordan (today’s Jordan). The plan caused outrage among both parties and was turned down by Israel as well as all Arab states except Transjordan. The Swedish Count UN diplomat then began to work on a new proposal for a peaceful solution to the conflict. But he never had a chance to present it to the UN General Assembly. When Folke Bernadotte traveled in a convoy of three cars on his way to negotiations in Jerusalem in the afternoon on September 17, the Zionist terrorists set up an ambush by pretending their car broke down. That's how the UN convoy was stopped in the Katamon quarter. Bernadotte opened the backseat side window to see for himself what was ahead on the road. He asked a person in camouflage fatigue who was running into his direction. The man who run into Bernadotte's direction was carrying a British-made machinegun. He asked Bernadotte if he is the person with this name. Bernadotte confirmed, which prompted the armed man to pour his weapon through the open window. Then he opened fire and a rain of bullets went through the car hitting Count Bernadotte and Colonel Andre P. Serot, French Air Forces, United Nations Observer several times, while Colonel Serot died instantly. Bernadotte lost consciousness almost immediately but died within a few minutes of his arrival at Hadassah Hospital. The man who shot and murdered was Yitzak Shamir. The two other men, Ben-Moshe and Steinberg shot at the tires of the UN vehicles, while Cohen was firing at the radiator of Bernadotte's car. Yitzak Shamir became prime minsiter from October 20, 1986 to July 13, 1992. The Russian Zionist migrant Menachim Begin (marked below), another member of the terrorist group succeeded Shamir as prime minister. The day after the terrorist attack, the United Nations Security Council condemned the killing of Bernadotte as "a cowardly act which appears to have been committed by a criminal group of terrorists in Jerusalem while the United Nations representative was fulfilling his peace-seeking mission in Palestine." On the website of the US State Department, on top of the page the visitor will read this "On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognized the new nation on the same day." On that page, no single word about the attack! The Zionist migrants from Central and Eastern Europe, on May 11, 1949 officially named 'Israelis', they were admitted to the United Nations as a full member on that day.
|