VIEW ABOUT HOW POLARIZATION HAVE EMERGED
16. THE YEARS OF POLARIZATION
INTRODUCTION The Palestinians claim their rights. The Israelis just take the rights. But who is right? A simple question that appears to be a very complex matter. We also must not forget that the Israelis don't show any respect and often in a manner that prompts us to ask: Do the Israelis recognize international law at all? The Gaza wars have showed they don't. The systematically forced eviction to annex pieces of land on which Palestinian houses are build show the Israelis don't. The use of their army to crackdown protests while being a war belligerent show the Israelis don't. The list is endless.
(SELF) INTEREST More unhelpful, if not destructive, is when countries resort in politics that is just supporting, and are even facilitation and contribution to that what the Israelis still doing. These countries only incite the Israelis even more. That is why efforts claimed by these countries don't have any value. The efforts they think to have achieved by contributors and participants, they appear to be Jewish while others appear to have close ties with the Israelis. Take the Middle East Quartet from 2011, which was a foursome of nations and international and supranational entities involved in 'mediating' the Israeli–Palestinian peace process. Britain's former prime minister Tony Blair was the envoy of this group. In February 2008, Blair is recorded as telling the quartet that he has a good relationship with Ehud Barak who was the Israeli defense minister at that time. Much further back in time, Blair forged close ties with Michael Levy, a leader of the Jewish Leadership Council. That was in 1994. UN Watch is an entity that proclaims itself as an NGO while it openly spies, not observe, for its belligerent occupation government and makes the results public in forms of political attacks and unfounded accusations. It has a seat in the UN Human Rights Assembly but only as observer. But, there is no single other member at the assembly that operates explicit and only for itself. So, if such an entity only operates on grounds of pure religionized self-interest, it is not an NGO. Everyone can ask for a rubber stamp "NGO" on the arm. That doesn't mean you are. And while we're writing from our own perspective, it gives us this freedom to write: Organizations which are independent of government involvement are known as non-governmental organizations or non-government organizations or NGO, typically one whose purpose is to address a social or political issue. UN Watch addresses not any social issue nor any political issue. It addresses issues which represents politicization of religionized ideas. They only lead to certain sentiments against Jews but in Europe and elsewhere around the world. They don't affect the Israelis because they don't live in other parts of the world. History of the Jewish migration have showed the world that real Jews are independent from any geo-location just like the Christians, the Catholics, Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus are showing. Zionists just show that they prefer to be depended but on one single geo-location because of written, not spoken words, and as claimed being a promise. The Christians and Catholics preaches this claim too while failing to realize that it is claimed as promised but by a god with a different name. Then, Israelis don't suffer from human rights violations by their own government. Israelis don't suffer from persecutions by their own government. Israelis don't suffer from abduction, kidnapping and murder by their own government. Israelis don't suffer from hatreds because they spread hate already for decades only causing a boomerang effect which they falsely claim as "antisemitism". It is the Palestinians who suffer from human rights violations but by the Israeli occupying war belligerent. It is the Palestinians who suffer from abduction, kidnapping and murder but by the Israeli occupying war belligerent. It is the Palestinians who suffer from forced eviction, deportation and even the erasure of material references to their existence. It is the Palestinians who suffer from hate long before the Israelis came to the idea to convert the Palestinian suffering into theirs. It is the Israelis who have never stopped seeking and still continue seeking for ways of methodics to get rid of the Palestinians since Nakba in 1948. In the international political arena, it always have worked this way: if one have never been taken to account for his actions, such is an exploit to others to do the same. Now, what has the 2008-2009 war to do with Hillel Neuer? The Zionist tried to divert attention away from two things:
Neuer launched an campaign against Richard Falk who was the UN special reporteur for the oPT. Falk was appointed to investigate. As a Zionist, Neuer fiercely opposed the appointment because of Falk's made statements, comments, recommendations from the past Neuer had brandished as advocacy for the Palestinians while his own practices at the United Nations are just that but for the Israelis. In other words, Neuer's actions are to erase all references to the existence of life of the Palestinians. Advocacy is a guidance to pay attention to these references. That is something at least the Zionists don't want. That is something the supporters of the Israelis don't want. It's like the Holocaust, it must only about them. Jews who live elsewhere in the world appear totally different. Holocaust is to them not only a Jewish matter. Neuer's motive is the same a Muslim would have when another Muslims stands up against Muslims. Here, Richard Falk, who is Jewish, didn't stand up against Jews, didn't stand up against all Israelis. He stood up against certain types of Israelis like Hillel Neuer himself, Netanyahu, Naftali Bennett, Benzi Gopstein, Mark Regev and Yehuda Glick. And, like it is to a Muslim, so it is no different to Neuer: Richard Falk was a traitor and should be treated as a traitor. But, you can't behave openly that way on neutral territory, which the Headquarters of the UN Human Rights Council is. That's why Neuer submitted his raged letter to the UN in New York. Neuer just acted either because of self-interest, the interest of the Israeli war belligerent or both.
ORTHODOX JEWISH CONSPIRACY Very clear is the year 2017 when Trump in January that year his son-in-law Jared Kushner appointed to draft a Middle East 'peace plan'. Kushner is an orthodox Jew. Kushner's team members David Friedman and Jason Greenblatt, both are also orthodox Jews. And, what was their peace all about? Persuading Arab countries to side with the Israelis! These orthodox Jews were not working on the issue that is between the Israelis and the Palestinians. They were working on an issue they wanted that it is between the Israelis and Arab countries, not about and with the Palestinians. So, these orthodox Jews just ignored the Palestinians while the rest of the world failed to realize that they've witnessed an religionized conspiracy. How is that? The accords are named after Abraham, which in Islam is by the name of Ibrahim. But, Abraham was not a Jew when he was still in Ur. And, Judaism didn't exist when he was migrating with his people from Ur to Cana'an. So, do the Arab leaders know what Abraham really is to Zionists and the othodox Jews? Do they know that Abraham was the leader of the Hebrew tribe who migrated from Ur, Mesopotamia to Canaan? Do these leaders know that Abrahamic religion does not exist as Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism, which sprouted from the Jesubite's tribal belief, while Islam is an offshoot from Christianity? Then, Ur is a ancient place in today's Southern Iraq. Abraham was not native to Canaan nor the Hebrew language he and his people spoke. It is clear that the so-called Middle East peace plan was a practice of blatant conspiracy. This brings us to question how to understand these practices other than in the context of Zionism? It's like the Chinese claim over the South China Sea. It's just a claim as they never have proven that the waters are indeed Chinese. They just focus on 'China' that is included in the name. They also have never allowed anyone from outside to see for the legitimacy of the claim. No one from outside have ever seen authentic documents but copies of documents you can Google for. But you can't see whether they are authentic or have been made authentic. The Chinese also do the same the Israelis do: they start there were something about theirs is first mentioned, not there were it has its roots. The rapid manner the Chinese are fortifying the sea is like when someone knows that he or she is wrong, refused to acknowledge and resort in all methods to divert attention away from what is wrong. But, there's more falsehood about the pact: There was never any war with Bahrain and the UAE. Both countries only didn't recognize the Israelis until their signing of the pact. So, there wasn't even a political war. See more under incitement.
POLITICIZATION Politicization is history's biggest enemy as it incites manipulation, falsification and even to mystification. The result is then a rewrite similar to what we do with movies. In modern times it goes like this: Start your computer. Open the video editor. Click on 'files' and look where you have the video that carries the title 'History Of Palestine'. Load it. Cut the whole period from the prehistory to the scene prior to the scene depicting "King David starting to build his city, he named Jerusalem". Delete it. Move the rest of the movie back to the beginning Save it and post it online. But, you can also do the same in writing like it is found done in Wikipedia where you can edit entries the way you want. Our computer story is just to illustrate. Politics is like that but starts in your mind. But it is not the internet. It is the tools needed to have access to the internet and tools you need to alter on the internet to begin with your laptop or desktop pc. That's how technology is used for example by the Zionist group CAMERA to whom Naftali Bennett, a high tech (!) billionaire, is linked to. As we wrote earlier the so-called UN-Watch is another source that distributes mystification. But its activities have nothing to do with the position as an observer. Neuer openly sneaks to cherry pick he views as "against Israelis". The results are released in forms of political attacks and unfounded accusations. Nothing in the world occurs to happen on its own. Something always needs something either to occur to happen or to become to exist. So it is the existence of something the Israelis brandish as terrorism and terrorists while blatantly ignoring the roots. The silencing of the roots is the main tread that goes through all rhetoric even about terrorism and terrorists, the ancestors of today's Israelis have introduced themselves. Disseminating politics the Israelis use is therefore no other than to divert attention away. But, they resort in more ways.
MOTIVE Polarizing is to cause something, especially something that contains different people or opinions, to divide into two completely opposing groups. It's actually setting up people against one other. But, to set up people against one other, you need something that causes people being against one other. A motive. Netanyahu showed his motive on January 10, 2009 when he said during an interview with CNN that Hamas must be destroyed. The question is how to bring a motive like those of Netanyahu into reality? Just fabricate allegations, accusations, claims and other falsehood. On June 19, 2008 Hamas and the Israelis agreed to a ceasefire. As part of the ceasefire, Palestinian militants agreed to immediately halt their attacks on Israel and Israel agreed to cease its military operations in Gaza. However, on November 5, 2008 the Israelis intruded Gaza to carry out an attack after they claimed that Hamas had fired rockets. The Israelis defended the attack this way:
First, the remark contains the word "pinpoint" that is copied from John Kerry who accused the Israelis of having carried out such attack: "That is pinpoint. That is pinpoint attack", John Kerry angrily said while leaving his press conference. The media where witnesses because the microphone stood open. During the press conference, the Israelis targeted an apartment building in Gaza City resulting in many casualties among the residents. The remark but copied and used by the Israelis is disseminated language or hasbara and is meant to divert attention away from the fact that the Israelis have breached the cease fire. On December 27, 2008 the war broke out. However, CNN found out that Hamas didn't fire any rocket. On November 14, 2012, Hamas leader Ahmed al-Jabari was assassinated by an Israeli missile air strike. Hamas retaliated by firing rockets. The Israelis counter-reacted by launching air strikes. A war became an reality but ended a week later. But, in September 2012 President Obama had just began a new peace talk process, which have led in full talks between Mahmoud Abbas and the then foreign minister Tzipi Livni, led by US Secretary of State John Kerry. Netanyahu agreed to the release of Palestinian (political) prisoners in four phases. Two phases completed without any problem. The third phase triggered protest among the Israelis who opposed the release of these prisoners. The protest put a pressure on Netanyahu. On April 3, 2014 he decided not to release the 4th and last batch of Palestinian prisoners. The whole peace process was jeopardized and triggered anger and protests in the West Bank.
INCITEMENT The term 'settlement' is synonymous to colonization as it is about the inhabitation of a piece of land by your own people. In fact, you need to take a piece of land from someone else first before you can colonize. It is called land grab (of that piece of land). But, that is a term you use in time of peace. Israelis are still war belligerent. The United Nations wouldn't speak in terms of "mounting to war crimes" if the Israelis have had declare their stage of war as lifted, which they still haven't done yet. So, they are not with peace thus their actions are annexation. Earlier on this page we wrote about the orthodox Jewish "peace pact", which is also a way of fueling incitement which resulted in their following achievement: On September 15, 2020 the UAE and Bahrain were the first Gulf countries who signed the American orthodox-Jewish pact. The Israelis agreed to delay settlement plans under its normalization deal with the UAE, something Emirati officials have cited in response to Arab and Muslim criticism. However, on October 15, 2020 the Israeli human rights watchdog, Peace Now reported that more than 3,000 West Bank settlement homes were approved, making it a total of 12,000 of these illegal homes that year alone. And on January 17, 2021 another 2,500 illegal settler homes were approved. It shows that the Israelis are not negotiators but false, distrustful actors. On April 7, 2021 Netanyahu announced the forced eviction of Palestinians from Sheik Jarrah. Such announcements have always incite right-wing settlers like this example shows about an ultra-Zionist, speaking English with an American accent who just walked into a Palestinian house in this East Jerusalem neighborhood. The incident took place on May 5, 2021 during the Passover provocation at the Al Aqsa mosque that influenced the situation in Sheik Jarrah as it triggered a protest forced eviction Netanyahu had announced during the settler provocation.. The Israelis, however, are war belligerent as they are constantly reminded to when the United Nations warn that forced evictions and demolitions amounts to war crimes. Forced eviction and demolition are to achieve the goal of erasing the Palestinian existence. The Israelis regularly claim that targeted buildings were constructed without permit. However, the policy of permits violates the treaty laws on occupation. If we look at the ways the Israelis have resorted in Gaza wars, and if we look at the unstoppable forced evictions and demolitions, we see that the Israelis just simply ignore the fact that they are subjected to treaty laws. The way the Israelis ignore international laws proofs that they simply don't recognize these laws for the simply reason that they are an obstruction to the Israeli achievement to seize as much as possible. This is a war crime as it is forbidden to create a new nation inside the occupied nation or to expand by creating new parts of territory. If own people are encourage to contribute, it echoes in the way they do: incited uprooting of Palestinians from their homes to take the houses over, incited destruction of Palestinian farmlands, incited throwing of rocks on parked Palestinians cars, even incited killing of Palestinians. Incitement don't need explicit to come from their leaders. Influence from outside can also contribute to (more) fueling of incitement such as via lobbyists who either are Israelis themselves or those who lobby on behalf of the Israelis. It is assimilation into the political sovereignty of countries and their people :
We wrote in '(self) interest', which is one of the elements in Netanyahu's era of polarization, about Jared Kushner's Middle East 'peace plan', and that his team members David Friedman and Jason Greenblatt are also orthodox Jews. Well, the premeditation of forming such a group not only hallmarks collective religious hate against an selected group of people from another religion. The group also incites actions against the targeted group of people. On February 21, 2021 the UAE decided to drastically reduce its funding to the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees in 2020, the year it signed the orthodox-Jewish brokered normalization accord with the Israelis that was heavily criticized by the Palestinian Authority. But, this is not an isolated case. It has its roots: It is not a secret that the Israeli hard-liners have the desire to exterminate the entire Palestinian existence. It is to many in the world a secret that these Israelis treat everyone, and everything in Palestine as terrorists, and those who oppose the Israelis as antisemitist. So, every aid from outside is seen is an attempt to help the Palestinians to survive. In relation to Gaza, the Israelis even run a calorie scheme, discovered in October 2012, to keep the affected people barely alive. The Israelis tried to keep the practice secret as it would cost these hardliners their friendship when the US finds out that they let Gazans just starving to death. That is why Netanyahu on January 7, 2018 said that he wanted UNRWA gradually to be shut down. Eight months later Trump decided to stop the funding.
PROVOCATION Provocation is by influence that causes incitement to provoke like this example shows. Passover is a Judaic ritual, the Israelis held every year during the period from April 15th to April 23rd. The Ramadan begins on April 12th and ends on May 12th every year. Provocateurs "passover" the terrain of the Al Aqsa compound in the exact period when Passover and Ramadan overlapse each other, every year under illegal protection by occupying forces. However, "Passover" have nothing to do with any temple nor with anything on the Al Aqsa compound. It refers to this explanation:
In the quote "Israelites" are pictured as if they are Jews. They were a tribe, not slaves, which came from the south and entered the territory of the Amelekite tribe. There is no hard conclusive evidence found showing that this tribe were the people who followed Moses during his during encircling the Sinai desert then into northern direction as detailed in many Judaic claims. There is even no hard conclusive evidence found showing how that Moses' journey was the way as claimed.
Stories about the Israelites, that means from where in the south did they come from, have never been exact detailed. We only know that they where driven out by the Amelekites into northern direction, according to found details to the land of King David who in return drove the Israelites out into the direction of the hills where the Jesubite tribe resided.
Then, Israeli provocateurs are to be accused of misusing their own belief for destructive purpose that amounts to that what Jihad is known for.
'Jihad' means revenge, retaliation or religious war.
History of the settler provactions have showed that their actions always lead to brutal crackdown, illegal abductions, wounded and deaths among Palestinians when they try to defende themselves.
Like exploiting of Holocaust, the Israelis exploit the self-defense by the Palestinians by claiming they've been attacked. But it becomes polarized when countries who are part of the problem utterly say "The Israelis have the right to defend themselves".
Note: The original version contains embedded videos which we cannot publish due to limited webspace. |
Important:
this page is not about the blockade but about a view on the occupation.
HOW GAZA BECAME UNDER ISRAELI CONTROL
Before the Israelis started to "control" Gaza it was under Egypt until that war when the Israelis seized the strip along with several other important areas of land. The Israelis then began to expand their territory beyond the internationally recognized borders of their territory. There were 21 settlements in Gaza under the occupier's administration of the Hof Aza Regional Council. The land was allocated in such a way that each Israeli settler disposed of 400 times the land available to the Palestinian refugees, and 20 times the volume of water allowed to the peasant farmers of Gaza. The first settlement was Kfar Darom, which was originally established in 1947, and reformed in 1970. However, in 1956, the then president of Egypt, Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the French-British Suez Company that controlled the Suez Canal. Paris and London wanted the strategic water way back but were eager to start a war themselves. Both countries sought contact with the Israelis to ask them for help. In fact, France and Britain were asking the Israelis to start a war for them. That's how Gaza became into Israeli hands. In 2003, Ariel Sharon proposed the withdrawal from Gaza in the wake of a peace agreement between the Israelis and Egypt. That agreement have led to the dismantling of settlements in the Sinai.. Sharon's proposal came into effect in 2005 with the dismantling of the 21 settlements. The dismantling didn't take place without resistance by settlers. In 1987, several Palestinians were killed by an Israeli driver. The car attack, not an accident as altered by CAMERA in WIkipedia, triggered the First Intifada, a Palestinian uprising against Israeli West Bank and Gaza occupation. led Yassin and six other Palestinians to found Hamas. In 2006, Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections and assumed administrative control of Gaza Strip and West Bank. In response, Egypt and the Israelis blockade Gaza by closing the land borders, preventing air traffic from and to Gaza and by stopping all maritime traffic into the territorial waters of Gaza. Hamas supposed to be viewed the way the Zealots from the 1st-century are described: resistance as they assassinated collaborators with Roman rule in the province of Judea. So, the first terrorists were East European Jewish migrants from Poland and Belarus who formed the Stern group to attack the British. The group is also responsible for the ambush and murder of the UN diplomat, the Swedish count Folke Bernadotte. The terror attack is the roots of the rush invention of "Israelis" in 1948. The definition of 'terror' is extreme fear. 'ism' at the end of the word 'terror' is a suffix to indicate that 'terror' represents acts and activities related to causing extreme fear, while 'terrorizing' is the act with the aim to cause extreme fear. The word 'terrorism' refers to methodologies on which the use of terror is based. Anyone who resort in acts and activities with the intention to cause extreme fear, that person is a terrorist. But, when two or more people form, or people join the forming of a group with the intention to cause extreme fear, they are members of a terror group, not a terrorist group as that is a political popularized term. Political popularization of "terrorism" have led to misuse, even to exploit since US President George W. Bush on September 20, 2001 introduced 'war on terror' during his speech to the Congress. Canada, the European Union, Israelis, Japan and the United States have designated Hamas as a terrorist organization. Australia, New Zealand, Paraguay and the United Kingdom have designated only its military wing as a terrorist organization (as of 2021). It is not considered a terrorist organization by Brazil, China, Egypt, Iran, Norway, Qatar, Russia, Syria and Turkey. In December 2018, the United Nations General Assembly rejected a U.S. resolution condemning Hamas as a terrorist organization. The question rises when is it legitimate to label an entity as an terror organization?
Well, Hamas is not residing in the Israeli territory nor is that territory in a time of peace as the Israelis never lifted the stage of war since 1967. That is why the United Nations still consider the Israelis as war belligerent. So, labeling Hamas as a "terrorist organization" is purely based on policies which hallmark support to Zionist politics against Hamas, not with criteria as written above. Israelis are simply known for their chronic lack of distinction as distinction is a threat to their policies in how to engage public relation (hasbara) . Now let's go back to the question: is it a blockade or an occupation? Blockade is an act, normally carried out in times of war whereby one party blocks entry to or departure from a defined part of an enemy's territory, most often its coasts. However, we have seen that there can be a blockade in time of peace like Qatar had to face by Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the UAE who started it all by launching a smear campaign that was mastermind by its ambassador to the US, Youself al-Otaiba. The issue? Qatar's regional policies which aren't those of the other GCC member states. Blockades are regulated by international law and custom and require advance warning to neutral states and impartial application. In international legal language:
Well, Gaza does no longer have an operational airport since the radar station and control tower were destroyed on December 4, 2001 and the runway was cut by Israeli bulldozers on January 10, 2002. Then, there is no Israeli presence at any port entrance of Gaza's harbors. So, what is it? A blockade? Compare it with preventing everyone from entering and leaving a house (means Gaza) as you do that by positioning yourself outside the house and in front of the garden (means Gaza waters) of the house in order to allow some free movement of those who are (still) inside. But that is not what the Israelis do. Just watch this example filmed by the Italian activist Rosa Schiano on September 3, 2012. She wrote:
Her writing reveals that the Israelis were not outside the garden and blocking the entrance to the house. They're in the garden (means Gaza waters) with the fence (means Gaza's maritime border) behind them. That what she mentioned as "Jericho Agreements" is a set of paperwork of something that is just a simple line drawn across the garden to limit the movement of people who live in the house (means Gaza). That is not blockading while you're in the garden. You just do two things: occupying the garden (means Gaza waters) while limiting the movement in the garden. On the clickable map it is actually this: In fact, the created situation, even with agreements and accords, is similar to the occupation in the West Bank but without annexation. So, in our view it is scalable maritime border occupation. The motive to falsely name it a blockade is to prevent Hamas from exploring a gas field that is in their waters but behind the Jericho Agreement Line.
|
Important:
this page is not about genocide but about a view on the question.
IS IT GENOCIDE ?
The Israelis are a war belligerent. How do we know that? Well, actually everyone could have known if they did understand the United Nations when they issues warnings to the Israelis, that actions could amount to war crimes. You don't use 'war crimes' when nobody is in a stage of war. The Israelis never have lifted the stage of war since 1967. The reason why they never have lifted is simple to explain to one thing: they're just not finished with annexation. That is why the Israelis never provided their official borders to the UN. Unlike what is generally viewed, we distinct war violation and war crime from each other. WIn our view, war violation refers to breaches against protocols and/or rules while war crimes refers to unlawful acts to willfully cause damage and destruction during time of war. For instance: If the occupying power thinks it needs to own a piece of land, so it takes it with the aim to transfer own people -even foreign citizens- to the taken land that is in the occupied territory, both are a war violation as they breach the Rules Of Occupation Building a settlement for these people is a breach of the Rules of Usufruct specific to the Rules Of Occupation as it permanently changes the environmental identity of that piece of land in the territory that is under occupation. When the occupying power finds objects and structures, which are either part of the identity of the occupied land, or are objects needed to have an locally based existence, and decides to remove them in order to replace with its own, it is a breach to the same rules. When all the before mentioned is systematically, that it hallmarks the existence of a used program, raising the suspicion that the program is meant to stop the continuation of life but across the entire occupied territory, we then have a serious problem especially when occupation military is involved in the achievement. Because, the planning of the locations of settlements is by an military unit. That is what found photos reveal which were taken on construction sites where military officers were seen acting as if they are verifying construction plans.
EXISTENCE. In short: it means your physical presence, your being, you but 'confirmed' visually by the eyes of anyone who sees you. However, existence has a broader meaning as it is actually an umbrella term encompassing everything that is needed to exist, not to mention to continue to exist. Among those belonging to 'everything' are your roots and ancestry, your tradition, your culture, your native language and your belief. They all are elements belonging to your identity. Material belongings are your house, your property even the whole town or city or neighborhood if not your land as a country were you belong to. Then we have life, which includes food, water, electricity, health, communication and the availability to have a place to stay. This all is existence. Erasing all references to the existence of life with the aim to end its continuation doesn't directly need to include making an direct end to psysical life. This can also gradually by a program, a policy, doctrine or directive. We're then dealing with cultural genocide. But, if the above also includes systematically causing casualties among those who are members of another nation*, ethnicity* and another religion* as well damaging and destroying references to these people's existence, either in whole or in part, we won't support the view of war crimes nor crimes against humanity.
Read more at "There Will Be No Change".
*)
**) click on any of the images to enlarge.
|
Important:
this page is not about ancestory but about a view on a ancestory.
WHAT IS AN ARAB ISRAELI ?
In chapter "No historical continuity / part 1: Genetic roots", we have tried to give you an idea how science is failing to realize that they are studying how the Jews have lost their historical continuity. We also wrote that Jews and Palestinians, that means those Palestinians who never migrated from their homeland thus not from a settler or colonial population, have their roots via extensively mixing between Egyptians, Mesopotamians, and Anatolians. Two aspects which make studying genetics of these people in another way very interesting, namely on the question "Why do a lot of today's Israelis show an behavior, a way of thinking, and a way of acting that are like Arabs."? The answer is in the person of the Israelis as we know that there are two types of Israeli men. However, the world only knows one type: those who look like Caucasian. They are the descendants of Caucasian Jews who came from outside Palestine such as during the two migrations from Europe and illegal crowdfunding that is still taking place . But, today's Caucasian Jews may either have their parents from a similar root or they are migrants who have illegally settled in the West Bank. It is very important to know that there were no Caucasian Jews until the first migration to Ottoman Palestine between 1881 and 1903. The much lesser known Israeli type is pictured above. Israeli men but those as pictured have a look which is quiet similar to Arab men. Assume that they're Arab, then their genetics could lead back to the very forefathers from the time when people in Canaan started mixing with one other. Among those people should also include Arabic people who migrated from north, from the east and from the south of Canaan. Today, Arab Israeli men look like this:
So, when interracial mixing began, so began the passing of genetic material containing codes including those of characters of personality. Every birth goes that way. You have something from your father and something from your mother. However, you may also have something that is passed on to your father and mother, and then passed on to you. And so do you when you start a family yourself. That is actually what genetic continuity is all about. With all respect to Arabic people, but Arabic men are generally known for their impulsivity, extreme emotion, and uncontrollability. Elements which always lead to instant aggressiveness, which in return makes it very easy to resort in violence or worse. The element of uncontrollability is the roots of loosing touch with reality, which in return is the cause of having no single sense of reasonableness. It leads to extreme emotion with the result lack of self-reflection and self-accountability. That explains self-pitying and self-victimizing. All these elements are in the codes of genetic material that has been passed on for thousands and thousands of years. It is no different to those who are Arab Israelis, especially when you look at the fact that there's interracial engagement between Arab Israelis and Caucasian Israelis (photo below). And so they pass on the elements from one to the other. Now you have an idea why we view the Arab Israelis and the Caucasian Israelis as no other than similar to those in neighboring countries. Why do we name them "Arab Israelis"? This is because there is already something that is called "Israeli Arabs" which refers to the citizenship given to Arabs who are allowed to live among the Israelis. However, no one have the same quantity of genetic material and therefore the intensity of characters of personality differs from person to person as it is like what you have from your father and mother. You may have a little bit more from your father and a little bit less from your mother while the rest is you. Another variant may look like a lot from your mother, few from your father, an amount that is passed on to your father or mother then passed on to you while the rest is you. And so there are numerous variants. That all is genetically defined. |
Important:
this page is not about conflict but about a view on the use of 'conflict'.
IS THERE A CONFLICT?
As we wrote on our very first page, there are a lot of websites that are driven by politics, politicization and even religionization, which divert readers attention away from what's really behind. It is not politics, politicization nor religionization. It all have to do with evolution in which 'things' occur to happen one after the other. That also includes the way involved people became to be from the beginning to the present time of today. Genetic material in people play a crucial role in how 'things' are going to happen. A question: What is 'territory'? Well, there are various ways to answer, from abstract to define in international legal terms and everything in between. We keep it by an explanation you're best familiar with: Territory is something like a piece of land that is fenced off to keep everyone out who doesn't belong on this land. You may have a house with a surrounding garden. But, you fence it off to send the message "this is my piece of land" or "I'm the owner of this land". It is a simple explanation for something, which origin is not by humans. It was already there .... in nature. Animals are familiar with 'territory' as they mark the boundaries their territory by instinct but with the same intention you have: sending the message to tell what's yours. The first signs of permanent settlement was when humans began to domesticate plants and animals. That was some 10,000 years ago. But, you need to have something to keep the animals. So, our very first farmers used stakes they pour into the ground the way as pictured. In archeological terms, stakes are called palisades, which were used just to protect their domesticated animals from being stolen, not to send the message that it is their land. That became to change when humans wanted to expand their presence but in the territory of other humans. The way they did is by the way they where*, the way they thought and the way they're used to do things. But, there are many reasons to seek for expansion, so not just only because of more space. And, there are even combinations behind such domination and possession, which has been in our lives since the biblical ages. Humans not only have always brought their physical presence with them but also what's inside the physical presence*. It's here were religion has its roots. But, before we continue we need to know what exactly means 'religion'. On the internet you will find:
However, in our view religion is not any deliberation as they lead to views or opinions especially when they are meant to push for a cause that leads to some sort of separatism, better known as offshoots, or that leads to doctrines such as Islamism and Zionism. The way how they (have) separate from whatever plays a crucial role as incitement is a way to influence. For example: On this webpage we found a quote from the founder of modern Zionism*, Theodor Herzl:
On that same webpage we found from another Zionist, David Ben Gurion in 1938
The first statement is clear exploiting anti-Semitism. Jews didn't flee for that reason. They fled Russia because there was a revolution. The second statement is exploiting the refugee crisis prior to WWII, but to incite. Both statements were meant in order to influence with the intention to gain authority. They are the earliest traces in modern history showing that it is not about a conflict with the Palestinians. You need to view from a much different perspective, those of collective behavior. So, we view it as a psychological struggle triggered by a phantom fear of extinction as a result of exaggerated imaginary. This in return has its roots in paranoia. Add the elements of extreme emotion and uncontrollability and you have all the ingredients needed to understand the violent and aggressive way of thinking the Israelis have, resulting in brutal, often bloody acts of today. In other words: it's all about expansion to 'survive' (lebensraum) by building upon seized native existence just like what King David did thousands of years ago.
*) Zionism was already in 1879 by means of European migrants who were building small settlements in Palestine.
|
Important:
this page is not about history but about a view on a history.
WHO IS REALLY INDIGENOUS ? (and the misuse of antisemitism by (pro-) Israelis)
The Israelis also try to protect and preserve their cause in another way: falsifying, mystifying and denying. It goes like this: On June 9, 2020 Netanyahu uttered the terms "invented Palestinians" and "indigenous Jews". That is a disgusting copy as it has its origin to the person of the American republican hardliner Newt Gingrich. That brings us the question: what is 'indigenous'? In non-institutionalized definition, 'indigenous' is adjective and refers to the notion of a place-based human ethnic culture that has not migrated from its homeland, and is not a settler or colonial population. Merriam Webster dictionary explains 'indigenous' as the earliest known inhabitants of a place and especially of a place that was colonized by a now-dominant group The institutionalized definition about 'indigenous' as written by the United Nations:
The basis is poor as the 6 points are completely vague and open for any interpretation. The second point is even an attempt to falsify the chronology inherent to historical continuity. Self-identification is an autonomous act but leads to inaccuracy when it comes to "Jew" and "Israeli". "Jew" adjective to a religion that sprouted as an offshoot from another belief. while "Israeli" is adjective to the results forthcoming from developments that have led to the invention in 1948. The roots is the assassination of a UN diplomat in September 1948, which in return has its roots in the invasion of the Zionist migrants in 1947, which in return is a continuation from the early 1900s. Any continuity is about the continuation of a cycle of events over an immeasurable period of time, and the recognition of events as inseparably interconnected. So it is when we speak about historical continuity. However, the cycle didn't start to run by the assassination. It was running for thousands and thousands of years. But, not every event belongs to a certain historical continuity as they may have their roots in another continuity. For instance, the migration from Eastern Europe in 1905 was not by ethnic related cycle. There was a revolution in Russia, which prompted Russian Jews to flee. The migration from Central and Eastern Europe in 1947 was even by an religionized political invention in 1897, Zionism. So it is when we look at the continuity from a biblical perspective. If we focus on what is biblical written, then there were two groups of people who entered Canaan. The first group are written as those freed from slavery and were led by Moses (in Islam, Musa). The other group are written as those who migrated from Mesopotamia and were led by Abraham (in Islam: Ibrahim). This means that there are two historical continuities: one that started in Egypt and the other in Mesopotamia. So, according to our understanding, there is no proven historical continuity that relates modern-day Jews to the people, documented by historians as led by Moses, because there is no evidence found in the Sinai. There's also no historic continuity that relates the Jews with the Abrahamic tribe as the first Jews have no roots in Mesopotamia were the Abrahamic tribe came from (see map). Interesting is this: 'Hebrew' appears to be adjective to the Abrahamic people as a tribe, and who are named after the language they spoke: Hebrews. This indicates that the Hebrew language is not native to Canaan but to the region were Abraham came from, Ur in today's Iraq Then this, if we connect any historic continuity to the Israelites, to whom the Israelis liken themselves with by linking them with the victory on the conquest of Jebus by King David, the question rises how did David became king of these tribe while he had his kingdom far north and away from the territory now known as the Negev Deser. A desert that was inhabit by the Amalekites. The people who entered the territory of the Amalekites from the south, by Jews described as Israelites, these people ended up in the territory of King David who drove them out into the direction of the hills of Jebus. But, the Jews still connect the Israelites with King David's seizure of Jebus, now Jerusalem as their way of documenting insinuates that the Israelites have fought with the king to seize Jebus. It's quiet illogical to document the Israelites first as driven out by King David, as we found in several referrals, then let modern-day people believe that the driven people have a link in the rebuilding of Jebus but as King David's city. And, if we translate it to modern times, those who stood at the beginning (1948-1960s), they also don't have any historical continuity that sprouted in Palestine:
So, anyone who speaks in terms of 'invented people' they have invented themselves as 'Israelis' have no historical continuity as it didn't sprout in Palestine. It is a naming enforced to accept by others. That enforcement was by assassinating the Swedish UN diplomat Folke Bernadotte in an ambush, carried out by Shamir, not by Cohen. It is the roots of Sweden's policy on Palestine. *) In Wikipedia, details of involvment by 'Yitzak Shamir' has been altered in 'Cohen" by US-based Zionist group CAMARA On September 24, 2020 BESA published an article in an attempt to explain its readers something that didn't exist: "Why Arabs Hate The Palestinians". The article was published amid Jarred Kushner's regional destabilizing actions to persuade Gulf states to take side with the Israelis. The headlined question was an attempt to let the English reading Arabs believe that the course for an own Palestinian state was to blame. Hasbara, which is the basis the Israelis and their supporters use in their 'communication' with the outside world, is described as a reference to public-relations efforts to disseminate positive information abroad about the Israelis and their actions, whereby dissemination is scattering or spreading widely, as though sowing seed disseminate ideas. However, it is actually a practice to deflect attention away from that what is initially the issue. In plain words: Israelis and their supporters don't want you to talk about what should or must be talked about: the essence of the matter, not whatever is achieved. It is an kind of robbing you from the right of freedom of expression by accusing you of "anti-Semitism". But, who and what is Semitic? The Spanish language was distributed via colonization that began with the Spanish Conquest of the Americas in 1519. The Spaniards not only brought their language to the continent but also their religion and culture. When the Spaniards engaged interracial relationship, they became the ancestors for all later ancestors who then became the ancestors of today's Central and South American people. That doesn't mean that today's people, who now have Spanish as their 'native language', and have their religion from the Spanish, are Spanish originated people. It is exact the same to the Hebrew language when it was first distributed across Southern Europe and from there into the rest of Europe. When Palestine became a Roman empire province, Jews who have fled also distributed their language, religion and culture. They are the first ancestors of all later ancestors of ancestors of today's Jews in Europe. This doesn't mean that today's Jews in Europe are Semitic people. They are not. Nor are they originated to Semitic people as their ancestries sprouted in Europe. The map on the right isn't only showing the reason of a migration. It also shows the result of migration, namely the distribution of the Hebrew language, Jewish religion and culture between 1850 and 1914 and reminds us to the map of the Spanish with the difference that the map below is not about a conquest. The Israelis from the old generation are originated from those during the migration while the young Israeli generation have parents who are the children of the old generation who in return are the children of the migrants generation. In the 21st century, Jews in Palestine are from all corners of the world mostly via illegal crowd funding by the Jewish Agency For Israel, which presents itself as a non-government organization, a title misused as the Israelis are occupying belligerents. So, how can anyone be accused of anti-Semitism when Semitism is factual about indigenous Semitic people. These people do no longer live and that for ages. What is practiced in the 21st century, when whoever views criticism against Jews in Europe as anti-Semitism, it is ripping Semitism completely out of its historical context. |
Important:
this page is not about history but about a view on a history.
EXPLOITING A WAR
The Nazi's need of Eastern Europe as 'lebensraum' was covered by Hitler's propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels who instigated and incited Jew hatred by holding series of speeches full with falsehood and other lies. But, don't we all know similar developments in our present time? Yes, we do but there are too many among us who pretend these developments as they do not exist. Well, they do! Here are 54 quotes: The oldest example is only known by people who are familiar with the history about how the Israelis became the first in the introduction of military use of nuclear material in the Middle East.: During the mid-summer of 1960, an American corporate official was talking to U.S. diplomats in Tel Aviv while sharing information about construction activities near Dimona. The diplomats documented the conversation in a cable they send to Washington. John F. Kennedy immediately wanted explanation about the activities. But the Israelis repeatedly provided less than credible answers. It was the site of a textile factory, the Israelis said. Well, not quiet a lie because there was such factory there. But, when the Americans demanded a visit to the site, the Israelis turned aggressive. The Israeli leader David Ben Gurion felt the pressure that came from John F. Kennedy's administration. He had to say something. So he came with this: ".. to prevent a second Holocaust from happening". The documentation of the cables and other files on the Israeli nuclear issue are here. In September 1950, the Germans signed a agreement to pay a sum of 3 billion marks over the next fourteen years; 450 million marks were paid to the World Jewish Congress. The payments were made to the Israelis -who just had their name since three years- as the heir to those victims who had no surviving family. So, 450 million marks paid to an organization that is traditionally deeply rooted in almost all strategic economical and financial position worldwide. In April 2015, the then FBI director James Comey wrote in an Washington Post article:
This is a clear insinuation against Poland as "murderers and accomplices" is also a description against that country. Comey's remark is also an accusation against the Polish for being responsible for the concentration camps in Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Treblinka. Comey ignores the fact that Poland was invaded and occupied by the Nazis on September 1, 1939. That's two days before Britain and France declared war on the Nazis. Poland also became the first country under control but by two powers acting in accordance with the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Germany acquired 48.4% of the former Polish territory. Comey's remark shows amateurism in the history of the Second World War as it is heavily influenced by the pro-Zionist stance the US has for decades. In 2016, the Israelis demanded compensation from Poland that must have been inspired by remarks and statement such as of James Comey. But in Poland, conservatist Jaroslaw Kaczynski did the same but from Germany. That would sound logical as the country was taken by the Nazis (and the Soviets). Still, Polish right-wing groups protested against Germany as it didn't compensate Poland the way the Israelis are, who didn't exist during the war. The Germans never provided a proper explanation. Germany vows to stand with the Israelis despite the Holocaust. But as said before, the Israelis don't have an historical link to the war. East European Jewish migrant just gave themselves the adjective in 1948. That's three years after the war. The map below suppose to bring awareness that we have to talk about two different groups of migrants: those who left during the rise of Nazism in Germany, which the map shows, and those who left during the rise of Zionism which spread from Austria, Germany to Britain. That was in 1947. Those who became Israelis in 1948, they were the first converted Zionists who were already in Palestine since 1947. No Jews arrived there because they all went the the Americas while smaller numbers went to other regions of the world. And those the Israelis consider as Holocaust survivors, their historical continuity as such survivor ends when leaving for a place outside Europe. The Holocaust just simply didn't happen in Palestine. The Israeli demand has simply no relation to the war but with, what we call the "Zionization of the Second World War" as the Israelis made it as an inseparable part of the "1948 event'. That's were the Israeli hunt for compensations come from. Exploiting of the Second World War is just part of the Israeli Zionist survival strategy. That is why the Israelis use a protocol for foreigner leaders when they come to visit, and that systematically includes a "ceremony" at Yadvashem to send visiting leaders the message "you should put us first" as if the whole world is responsible for something that took place in Europe but by the Israelis has been hijacked to use it for their own (Zionist) cause. What strikes us so deeply is that you will never hear from the Israelis, that the highest number of Jews, killed by the Nazis, is in the Netherlands. Three quarter of the Jewish community in that country just uprooted. Jews who never came to the ideas to leave their country for a Zionist cause. However, exploiting the war has also other dimensions: In July 2015, the then republican candidate Mike Huckabee said to the right-wing outlet Breibart:
He made this utter remark to express his opposition against the JCPOA agreement that was signed on July 14th by the so-called P5+1 on the Iranian nuclear program. In October 2015, Netanyahu have accused the Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem during W.W.II, Haj Amin al-Husseini, of causing the Holocaust and "fomenting the final solution" while giving a speech at the World Zionist Conference in Jerusalem.
|
Important
This page is not about history but about a view on a history
NO HISTORICAL CONTINUITY PART 2. INVENTION BY TERRORISM
On December 10, 2011, the American hardline republican Newt Gingrich said this: “I think that we’ve had an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs, and who were historically part of the Arab community. And they had a chance to go many places, and for a variety of political reasons we have sustained this war against Israel now since the 1940s, and it’s tragic.” In an angerily response, the spokesman for the then American Task Force on Palestine, Hussein Ibish, said: “There was no Israel and no such thing as an “Israeli people” before 1948. So the idea that Palestinians are ‘an invented people’ while Israelis somehow are not is historically indefensible and inaccurate. Such statements seem to merely reflect deep historical ignorance and an irrational hostility towards Palestinian identity and nationalism.” On December 4, 2020 Tzipi Hotovely, on that day the new ambassador to the UK, said in her first speech that Nakba is "a very strong and very popular Arab lie." She added that the displacement of Palestinians since 1948, is "a made up story". Hotovely is known to us as a Zionist with an appalling record of racist and inflammatory misbehavior. It is not the first time that stubborn hardline Israelis come with utterances but after American hardline idiots have done already. So it is about the rhetoric "Hamas is a terrorist organization" Lehi is better known as the Stern Gang, and was a Zionist terrorist group founded by Avraham Stern in British Mandatory Palestine. Its avowed aim was to evict the British authorities from Palestine by use of violence, allowing unrestricted immigration of Jews and the formation of a Jewish state, a "new totalitarian Hebrew republic". Avraham Stern, Yitzhak Shamir, Nathan Yellin-Mor were the three leaders. Stern and Shamir were both Zionist migrant from Poland while Zionist Yellin-Mor migrated from Belarus. So, none of them where indigenous people of Palestine. The group split from the Irgun militant group in 1940 in order to continue fighting the British during World War II. Lehi initially sought an alliance with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, offering to fight alongside them against the British in return for the transfer of all Jews from Nazi-occupied Europe to Palestine. On May 29, 1948, the Zionist migrants rooted government formally disbanded Lehi. However ... At the end of May 1948 Count Folke Bernadotte received a telegram from the UN Secretary-General Trygve Lie with an inquiry if Bernadotte would be willing to undertake the mission of acting as the UN’s mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Folke Bernadotte thereby became the UN’s first official mediator in the organization’s short history. Folke Bernadotte proceeded to formulate a proposal for a more sustainable solution to the conflict, and drafted a roadmap to peace. According to the plan the formerly British mandate Palestine should become a union between Jews and Arabs, where the Jewish part would consist of Israel and the Arabic part would consist of the Kingdom of Transjordan (today’s Jordan). The plan caused outrage among both parties and was turned down by Israel as well as all Arab states except Transjordan. The Swedish Count UN diplomat then began to work on a new proposal for a peaceful solution to the conflict. But he never had a chance to present it to the UN General Assembly. When Folke Bernadotte traveled in a convoy of three cars on his way to negotiations in Jerusalem in the afternoon on September 17, the Zionist terrorists set up an ambush by pretending their car broke down. That's how the UN convoy was stopped in the Katamon quarter. Bernadotte opened the backseat side window to see for himself what was ahead on the road. He asked a person in camouflage fatigue who was running into his direction. The man who run into Bernadotte's direction was carrying a British-made machinegun. He asked Bernadotte if he is the person with this name. Bernadotte confirmed, which prompted the armed man to pour his weapon through the open window. Then he opened fire and a rain of bullets went through the car hitting Count Bernadotte and Colonel Andre P. Serot, French Air Forces, United Nations Observer several times, while Colonel Serot died instantly. Bernadotte lost consciousness almost immediately but died within a few minutes of his arrival at Hadassah Hospital. The man who shot and murdered was Yitzak Shamir. The two other men, Ben-Moshe and Steinberg shot at the tires of the UN vehicles, while Cohen was firing at the radiator of Bernadotte's car. Yitzak Shamir became prime minsiter from October 20, 1986 to July 13, 1992. The Russian Zionist migrant Menachim Begin (marked below), another member of the terrorist group succeeded Shamir as prime minister. The day after the terrorist attack, the United Nations Security Council condemned the killing of Bernadotte as "a cowardly act which appears to have been committed by a criminal group of terrorists in Jerusalem while the United Nations representative was fulfilling his peace-seeking mission in Palestine." On the website of the US State Department, on top of the page the visitor will read this "On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognized the new nation on the same day." On that page, no single word about the attack! The Zionist migrants from Central and Eastern Europe, on May 11, 1949 officially named 'Israelis', they were admitted to the United Nations as a full member on that day.
|
Important:
this page is not about history but about a view on a history.
NO HISTORICAL CONTINUITY PART 1. GENETIC ROOTS
CAMERA is a US-based Zionist group that portrays itself as "reporting" and "analyzing" the Middle East. But, its website is full of attacks, mystifications, and isn't about the Middle East but about the Israelis and against anything that relates to the Palestinians. The organization is also active on Wikipedia were it in 2010 began to incite supporters of the Israelis by providing hasbara knowledge needed to alter entries to disseminate which makes Wikipedia no longer neutral on this issue. For example:
But, what does history show? A number of pre-British Mandatory (of Palestine) Zionists, from Ahad Ha'am and Ber Borochov to David Ben-Gurion and Yitzhak Ben Zvi thought of the Palestinian peasant population as descended from the ancient biblical Hebrews, but this belief was disowned when its ideological implications became problematic. Ahad Ha'am believed that, "the Moslems [of Palestine] are the ancient residents of the land ... who became Christians on the rise of Christianity and became Moslems on the arrival of Islam." Israel Belkind, the founder of the Bilu movement also have said that the Palestinian Arabs were the blood brothers of the Jews. Ber Borochov, one of the key ideological architects of Marxist Zionism, claimed as early as 1905 that. These statements have one thing in common: they are related to the question: who is indigenous? However, there are several definitions about 'indigenous', one of which we prefer to follow: the definition that refers to the notion of a place-based human ethnic culture that has not migrated from its homeland, and is not a settler or colonial population. During the Roman Empire, Jews had chosen to decide to flee Palestine, which means that they also had chosen to give up their sovereignty by leaving, no matter the reason, to resettle elsewhere. So, if they resettle elsewhere, their historical continuity also resets, and those after them, their historical continuity had yet to start running. We didn't mention the possibility to define the roots of an ethnic group by using (medical) scientific methods such as generic profiling. But, to be able to do such profile, you need samples of the very first people to match them with samples of today's people, not the samples of people from a cherry picked (Canaan) era or samples from a cherry picked (Jewish) group of people like the diagram below is showing. It looks very identical to similar diagrams but about the distribution of the first humans, starting from the region of what is now Uganda and Kenya into north, crossing the discussed region into what is now Turkey, and from there into and across Europe and to Asia. Is the unknown source trying to tell that the roots of the Jewish is anywhere in the sub-Saharan region, Ethiopia for example? In recent years, many genetic studies have demonstrated that, at least paternally, most of the various Jewish ethnic divisions and the Palestinians – and other Levantines – are genetically closer to each other than the Jews to their host countries. Many Palestinians themselves referred to their Jewish neighbours as their awlâd 'ammnâ or paternal cousins. According to a 2010 study by Behar et al. titled "The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people", Palestinians tested clustered genetically close to Bedouins, Jordanians and Saudi Arabians which was described as "consistent with a common origin in the Arabian Peninsula". In the same year a study by Atzmon and Harry Ostrer concluded that the Palestinians were, together with Bedouins, Druze and southern European groups, the closest genetic neighbors to most Jewish populations. One DNA study by Nebel found substantial genetic overlap among Palestinian Arabs and Ashkenazi* and Sephardic* Jews. A small but statistically significant difference was found in the Y-chromosomal haplogroup distributions of Sephardic Jews and Palestinians, but no significant differences were found between Ashkenazi Jews and Palestinians nor between the two Jewish communities. However, a highly distinct cluster was found in Palestinian haplotypes. 32% of the 143 Arab Y-chromosomes studied belonged to this "I&P Arab clade", which contained only one non-Arab chromosome, that of a Sephardic Jew. This could possibly be attributed to the geographical isolation of the Jews or to the immigration of Arab tribes in the first millennium. Nebel proposed that "part, or perhaps the majority" of Muslim Palestinians descend from "local inhabitants, mainly Christians and Jews, who had converted after the Islamic conquest in the seventh century AD". The problem with generic science is that it isn't telling which generation(s) from a Jewish or Palestinian group that have been researched to base findings like it is written above. Also, such science is in our view cherry picking in the evolution of the Middle East. Because, it is only about comparing one group of people with another group of people. It is even not about defining the geographic roots of anyone's origin but an attempt to prove anyone's identity. Let's take another example: “Ashkenaz” is Hebrew and refers to Germany. However, in this American newspaper we found that 'Ashkenazi'' are those who originated in Eastern Europe. That is weird as 'Ashkenazi'' is adjective and supposed to be to people who are from “Ashkenaz”. But, it looks that Ashkenazi Jews have their origin in a comnplete different part of the world. Here's a citiation from an article written by ecturer in population, medical and evolutionary genomics, University of Sheffield "It starts in Persia (modern-day Iran) during the sixth century. This is where most of the world’s Jews were living at this time. The tolerance of the Persians encouraged the Jews to adopt Persian names, words, traditions, and religious practices, and climb up the social ladder gaining a monopoly on trade. They also converted other people who were living along the Black Sea, to their Jewish faith. This helped to expand their global network. Among these converts were the Alans (Iranian nomadic pastoral people), Greeks, and Slavs who resided along the southern shores of the Black Sea. Upon conversion, they translated the Old Testament into Greek, built synagogues, and continued expanding the Jewish trade network." With all respect, but we see the failure of realizing that it is about studying a selected link belonging to an endless chain, which gives immense amount of knowledge but only about the selected link, the Ashkenazi Jews. If you want everything that belongs to the totality in an arrangement, laying out the exact order in which everything became to exist, you need to speak in terms of chronology, whereby scientific fractioning as written above, politics, politicization and even religionization are then irrelevant if they are not connected with one other. If we look at science of humanity, it is the study of connections. For instance, if you want to know how people though during the 16th and 17th centuries, just look in the arts in writing, painting and what's behind the composing of music. But we don't see this when it comes to a history. It is about, let us say 'everything' that belongs to a history. If we go back to the ancient times, we see that the Philistines, the Amalekites, the Canaanites, the people of Moses, the Hebrews (= Abrahamic people) also don't have a historical continiuty as the history of urbanization did not begin with them. They all have their predecessors too. These predecessors are the early modern humans and they also came from elsewhere as the map below shows . So, you simply can't say that archaeological and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites. They didn't as they appear to become to exist via extensively mixing between Egyptians, Mesopotamians, and Anatolians. Another strong indication that Israelis don't have any historical continuity. |
Important:
this page is not about history but about a view on a history.
LEBENSRAUM
Let us repeat this question: what is history? The abstract meaning is scientific study of the past. In a more broader sense, it is an umbrella term that relates to past events as well as the memory, discovery, collection, organization, presentation, and interpretation of information about these events. However, "umbrella term" is confusing because it is the presentation of a totality as a whole, so encompassing everything that belongs to that totality. But, if you want everything that belongs to the totality in an arrangement, laying out the exact order in which everything became to exist, you need to speak in terms of chronology, whereby politics, politicization and even religionization are irrelevant. "Everything" means here any link belonging to an endless chain. And, every link belongs to one other, is part of one other and is associated to one other even when a link is related to a link ahead of it or way back from it. Because, that particular link can't exist if it is not 'sprouted' from a previous link who also needs to 'sprout' from another link. That's what a chronology is. Only an untouched chronology of events presents the truth, not the politicization and religionization by snippet practices. Each link presents or represents an event, a happening, an occurrence. In first instance, they look different from each other as they may be about different issues in different situations like one is about religion while the next one is about war. But, are they really that different? For instance, "lebensraum" is the naming for a territory which a group, state, or nation believes it is needed for its survival. The term is best known in the context of Nazism were it was based upon Johan Rudolf Kjellén's geopolitical interpretation of Friedrich Ratzel's human-geography term. The Nazis established "lebensraum" as the racist rationale of their foreign policy by which they began the Second World War. They needed Eastern Europe to fulfill that idea, which was introduced on September 1, 1939. This absurd idea isn't new as a similar development occurred seven decades earlier but in the context of 'religionization' of politicized ideas. The resurfacing of Zionism in 1897 was also about establishing of such territory as Theodor Herzl (see image original cover of the book The Jewish State) proclaimed that Jews have the right to have their own land. At that time, Palestine was part of the Ottoman empire. So, on May 15, 1901 Herzl went to sultan Abdul Hamid to ask for autonomy of Palestine. The sultan denied. Herzl then went to the British who had a powerful influence in that region. But they offered Herzl Uganda. Herzl rejected that offer. On August 25,1933 German Zionists reached and signed an agreement the Nazis. It is known as the Haavara Agreement. The agreement was finalized after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany. It was a major factor in making the migration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine possible between 1933–1939. It is clear that the Zionists were already looking before the Nazis came to that idea ..... 'lebensraum'.
|