The prohibition of violence to civilians, including children, in particular murder, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture is a principle of Customary International Law, with universal applicability in all situations of armed conflict.
In Gaza, the violation of prohibition of violence to children is by militarized conflation, mutilation as a result of systematically using extreme disproportionality in attack, and cruel treatment by starvation.
The Israelis are systematically claiming that Hamas was among the people without providing any evidence of authentic nature showing that selecting and targeting of more than one person was of legitimate military objective, while meaning "they are all Hamas." We do not consider Israeli and pro-Israeli social media posts as evidence, but official documents verified on the ground by independent parties and confirmed.
Based on this Israeli action, GLOSM/PARES has decided to treat all information found as "war crime as part of 'Killing members of a group' as defined in the Genocide Convention, confirmed by viewing" as long as the Israelis do not allow anyone from outside, and who does have no relation to the parties involved, to verify.
In case you don't see the control bar, you can watch full screen by mouse-over to make the control bar visible, then click the square symbol.
Barbarism means extremely cruel and monstrous behavior. In the context of (extreme) hardline Israelis, the explanation refers to their behavior sprouted from how they view and provenly treat the Palestinians as animals. Letting (decomposing) corpses of Palestinians they have killed in Gaza to the dogs and cats is a barbaric behavior. Even luring starving (little) boys to "aid points" then targeting on specific parts of their body, is to classify as barbaric.
In case you don't see the control bar, you can watch full screen by mouse-over to make the control bar visible, then click the square symbol.
A car, an ambulance, an aid truck are civilian objects. What does the international law say when the Israelis are attacking to destroy these objects?
- The Principle of Distinction between Civilian Objects and Military Objectives
Rule 7. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilian objects and military objectives. Attacks may only be directed against military objectives. Attacks must not be directed against civilian objects.
The Israelis are systematically claiming that journalist in Gaza are Hamas without providing any evidence of authentic nature showing that selecting and targeting the journalist was of legitimate military objective. We do not consider Israeli and pro-Israeli social media posts as evidence, but official documents verified on the ground by independent parties and confirmed.
Based on this Israeli action, GLOSM/PARES has decided to treat all information found as "war crime as part of 'Killing members of a group' as defined in the Genocide Convention, confirmed by viewing" as long as the Israelis do not allow anyone from outside, and who does have no relation to the parties involved, to verify
In case you don't see the control bar, you can watch full screen by mouse-over to make the control bar visible, then click the square symbol.
Forced eviction and forced displacement, while related, refer to different scenarios of involuntary relocation.
Forced eviction specifically refers to the removal of people from their homes or private land against their will, often without due process or adequate compensation. Forced displacement, a broader term, encompasses the broader movement of people away from their habitual residences, which can include evictions but also other situations like fleeing conflict.
In Gaza, forced displacement encompasses the removal of (selected) large number of people (at once) from their neighborhoods, entire cities if not a whole regional area (i.e. north, central, south Gaza), which include evictions. These forced removals often go along with attacks while people are going or already on their way. In many cases, people even face attacks at places where they have arrived. It is then called dystopian terrorism by the Israeli military. If people are no longer allowed to return to their homes they were forced to leave, it is then ethnic cleansing.
However, found Israeli documents reveal that there was always the plan to take the whole of Gaza since October 2023. "October 7th" is just a pretext. See at the top of the demo video. So, Netanyahu's announcement from August 7, 2025, isn't new. What is new the next day is that he had to face the military leadership, who were strongly opposed. He was forced to compromise by only taking Gaza City.
But the world didn't see what we've seen. The city is located south of Northern Gaza and stretches from the land border in the east to the beach in the west. If the city has been taken, Netanyahu takes the north automatically, as it is then cut off from the rest of Gaza. People in Gaza City are forced to re-displace themselves, now to Al-Mawasi in Southern Gaza.
Another developments is found in the south where the Israelis were first forcing people to displace themselves from Rafah and Khan Younis to Deir al-Balah then forcing them and the residents of Deir al-Balah to Al-Mawasi, which indicates that the Israelis want to have all people of Gaza into a concentration zone no larger than 50 square kilometers.
This development forced us to replace the demo video about forced eviction, forced displacement, and forced re-displacement but ethnic cleansing.
In case you don't see the control bar, you can watch full screen by mouse-over to make the control bar visible, then click the square symbol.
On this page two demo videos. The video you're looking at is to explain how the Israelis prepared for a large scale starvation campaign by masterminding a bypass campaign against UNRWA that ultimately would lead to the beginning of starvation in Gaza. The second video is about attacking and destroying UNRWA facilities in Gaza. These attacks are also related to the first video, as the Israeli attacks also included UNRWA ware houses and distribution centers.
The Israelis are systematically claiming that the UNRWA is complicit in "Hamas tactics" without providing any evidence of authentic nature showing that the UN agency is of legitimate military objective, while meaning "they are all Hamas." We do not consider Israeli and pro-Israeli social media posts as evidence, but official documents verified on the ground by independent parties and confirmed.
Based on this Israeli action, GLOSM/PARES has decided to treat all information found as "war crime confirmed by viewing" as long as the Israelis do not allow anyone from outside, and who does have no relation to the parties involved, to verify
In case you don't see the control bar, you can watch full screen by mouse-over to make the control bar visible, then click the square symbol.
- genocide I - starvation - targeting and or killing people to prevent them from obtaining water
- genocide I - starvation - targeting and or killing people to prevent them from obtaining food - Gaza territorial waters
- genocide I - starvation - targeting and or killing people to prevent them from obtaining food
- genocide I - starvation - targeting and or killing people to prevent them from obtaining food: GHF points